This Act reforms the governance and functions of the Independent Commission
for Reconciliation and Information Recovery.
Explanatory notes to the Bill, prepared by the Northern Ireland Office, have been ordered to be published as HL Bill 59—EN.
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent has made the following statement under section 19(1)(a) of the Human Rights Act 1998:
In my view the provisions of the Northern Ireland Troubles Bill are compatible with the Convention rights.
A
bill
to
make new provision to address the legacy of the Northern Ireland Troubles.
B e it enacted by the King’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:—
This Act reforms the governance and functions of the Independent Commission
for Reconciliation and Information Recovery.
That body continues in existence but is renamed the Legacy Commission.
Part 2 of the Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023 is repealed.
This Act also—
makes provision about the Independent Commission on Information
Retrieval;
makes provision about inquests;
makes further provision relating to the Troubles.
In this Act “the Troubles” means the events and conduct that related to
Northern Ireland affairs and occurred during the period—
beginning with 1 January 1966, and
ending with 10 April 1998.
That includes any event or conduct during that period which was connected
with—
preventing,
investigating, or
otherwise dealing with the consequences of,
any other event or conduct relating to Northern Ireland affairs.
Accordingly, in this Act an event or conduct “forming part of the Troubles”
is an event or conduct that falls within
subsection (1)
(including any of a kind
described in
subsection (2)
).
In this Act “conduct” includes an act or an omission.
For the purposes of this Act, a death was “caused directly” by conduct forming
part of the Troubles if—
the death was wholly caused by physical injuries or physical illness,
or a combination of both, that resulted directly from an act of violence
or force, and
the act of violence or force was conduct forming part of the Troubles.
For the purposes of this section —
it does not matter if an event or conduct occurred in Northern Ireland,
in another part of the United Kingdom, or elsewhere;
“Northern Ireland affairs” means—
the constitutional status of Northern Ireland, or
political or sectarian hostility between people in Northern
Ireland.
This section applies where—
P’s conduct included the use of force which caused another person’s
death or caused another person to suffer physical harm, and
the use of force was in connection with P’s duties as a member of the
armed forces or a police force.
When exercising a function for the purposes of the investigation, proceedings
or inquest and in relation to P’s conduct, a relevant person—
must have regard to—
the capacity, as a member of the armed forces or a police force,
in which P was acting,
the fact that P’s conduct occurred in the context of violent
political unrest, and
the fact that force may lawfully be used to prevent unlawful
violence, and
must not regard lawful action taken in the course of duty as equivalent
to action taken for terrorist purposes.
When assessing P’s conduct for the purposes of the investigation, proceedings
or inquest, a relevant person must have regard to all of the circumstances in
which the conduct occurred, including—
P’s training and experience,
the duties which P was undertaking,
any orders or other instructions given to P,
the information available to P,
whether it appeared to P that any person was at risk of harm from
unlawful violence,
whether it appeared to P that the immediate use of force was required
to prevent that harm, and
the extent to which P acted in accordance with any rules of
engagement, or guidance regarding the use of force, that were then
applicable.
In this section—
“
relevant person”—
in relation to an investigation under
Part 3
, means the Legacy
Commission, a Director of Investigations or a judicial panel
member;
in relation to inquisitorial proceedings, means the Legacy
Commission or a judicial panel member;
in relation to a resumed inquest, means a coroner;
“
resumed inquest” means an inquest resumed in accordance with—
section 16AA of the Coroners Act (Northern Ireland) 1959, or
a direction given to the Presiding coroner under section 16AB of that Act,
(which are sections inserted by section 100 of this Act).
The Legacy Commission consists of—
the Legacy Commissioner (who is to be the chair of the Legacy
Commission),
between two and five other Commissioners,
two Directors of Investigations (see section 6 ),
the judicial panel members (see section 7 ), and
the Chief Executive Officer (see section 8 ).
The Legacy Commission’s principal functions are—
to carry out investigations under
Part 3
of conduct forming part of
the Troubles that caused death or harm, and to publish reports on the
findings of those investigations;
to carry out inquisitorial proceedings under
Part 4
examining the
circumstances of a person’s death, where that death was caused directly
by conduct forming part of the Troubles, and to publish reports on
the findings of those proceedings;
to publish personal statements under
section 80
(personal statements
by persons affected by deaths etc);
The Legacy Commission is to have a board (“the oversight board”) consisting
of—
the Commissioners, and
the Chief Executive Officer.
The oversight board’s principal functions are—
to set the strategic priorities and objectives for the Legacy Commission
and the persons mentioned in
subsection (1)
(a)
to
(e)
in exercising
functions,
to scrutinise the exercise of those functions against those priorities and
objectives,
to oversee the work of Legacy Commission officers,
to authorise itself, persons mentioned in
subsection (1)
(a)
to
(e)
and
Legacy Commission officers to exercise functions conferred on the
Legacy Commission (see
paragraph 5
of
Schedule 1
), and
to exercise any such functions which it has authorised itself to exercise.
In exercising functions under this Act, the Legacy Commission, the persons
mentioned in
subsection (1)
(a)
to
(e)
and the oversight board must have regard
to the need to secure public confidence in their work.
The Secretary of State may make payments or provide other resources to, or
in respect of, the Legacy Commission in connection with the exercise of the
functions of the Legacy Commission, the persons mentioned in
subsection
(1)
(a)
to
(e)
and the oversight board.
Part 1
of
Schedule 1
makes further provision about the Legacy Commission
and the oversight board.
The Commissioners are to be appointed by the Secretary of State.
In exercising the power under
subsection (1)
, the Secretary of State must so
far as practicable ensure that one or more of the Commissioners have
experience gained outside the United Kingdom that is relevant to the work
of the Legacy Commission under Parts
3
and
4
.
Part 2 of Schedule 1 makes further provision about the Commissioners.
The Secretary of State must appoint two persons to be Directors of
Investigations.
In exercising the power under
subsection (1)
, the Secretary of State must so
far as practicable ensure that—
one of the Directors has experience of conducting criminal
investigations in Northern Ireland, and
the other Director does not have that experience but has experience
of conducting criminal investigations outside Northern Ireland.
Part 3 of Schedule 1 makes further provision about Directors of Investigations.
The Secretary of State must appoint persons to be members of the Legacy
Commission judicial panel.
A person may be appointed only if they hold or have held high judicial office
within the meaning of
Part 3
of the
Constitutional Reform Act 2005
(see
section 60(2) of that Act).
The Secretary of State must appoint one of the judicial panel members as the
senior judicial panel member.
Where the person appointed under
subsection (3)
ceases to be a judicial panel
member, they also cease to be the senior judicial panel member.
Part 4 of Schedule 1 makes further provision about judicial panel members.
The Legacy Commission must employ a person to be, or make arrangements
for a person to be seconded to serve as, its Chief Executive Officer.
The Legacy Commission may employ other persons to be officers of the
Legacy Commission.
The Legacy Commission may make arrangements for other persons to be
seconded to serve as officers of the Legacy Commission.
In exercising the powers under subsections
(2)
and
(3)
, the Legacy Commission
must so far as practicable ensure that the officers of the Commission include—
persons who have experience of conducting criminal investigations in
Northern Ireland,
persons who do not have that experience but have experience of
conducting criminal investigations outside Northern Ireland, and
persons who are capable of providing assistance to judicial panel
members.
In this Act “Legacy Commission officers” means—
the Directors of Investigations,
the Chief Executive Officer, and
anyone else employed or seconded under this section.
Part 5
of
Schedule 1
makes further provision about Legacy Commission
officers.
The Secretary of State must establish a group, to be called the Victims and
Survivors Advisory Group (“the Group”).
The Group’s purpose is to provide general advice to—
the Legacy Commission,
the oversight board, and
the Secretary of State,
about exercising their functions under this Act in such a way as to meet the needs and uphold the rights and interests of victims and survivors of conduct forming part of the Troubles and their family members.
The Secretary of State must—
give the Group a document setting out proposed terms of reference
for the Group (which are to describe the scope of its work),
inform the Group of the period for making representations to the
Secretary of State about the proposed terms of reference,
when finalising the terms of reference, take account of any
representations made by the Group within that period, and
give the Group, and publish, the finalised terms of reference.
When exercising functions under this Act, the persons listed in
subsection
(2)
(a)
to
(d)
must have regard to the views given to them by the Group in
accordance with its terms of reference.
The Group established under
section 9
is to consist of at least 3 but not more
than 7 members appointed by the Secretary of State (one of whom is to be
appointed chair).
In appointing members, the Secretary of State must have regard to the need
to secure support from the different communities in Northern Ireland for the
Group and its work.
A person may not be appointed as a member if—
the person has been given (by a court anywhere in the world) a
sentence of imprisonment or detention for an offence other than a
sentence of imprisonment or detention for a term of less than 3 months,
or
the Secretary of State considers that the person has been a member of
an organisation, or given support to an organisation, while it was a
proscribed organisation.
The Secretary of State must so far as practicable ensure that—
the members consist of—
victims and survivors of conduct forming part of the Troubles,
and
persons appearing to the Secretary of State to represent the
interests of victims and survivors of such conduct,
the members include at least one person who—
is a victim or survivor of conduct forming part of the Troubles
and was a member of the armed forces or a police force during
the Troubles, or
appears to the Secretary of State to represent the interests of
such victims and survivors, and
membership is balanced as respects associations with the different
communities in Northern Ireland.
Each member is to hold and vacate office in accordance with the terms and
conditions of their appointment.
The Secretary of State may call on a member to resign from the Group if—
the member is given (by a court anywhere in the world) a sentence
of imprisonment or detention for an offence other than a sentence of
imprisonment or detention for a term of less than 3 months, or
the Secretary of State considers that the member has been a member
of an organisation, or given support to an organisation, while it was
a proscribed organisation.
If the Secretary of State calls on a member to resign, the member must
immediately resign.
For the purposes of this section—
“proscribed organisation” means an organisation proscribed under
terrorism legislation in the United Kingdom;
it is immaterial whether the sentencing, membership of an organisation
or giving of support described in
subsection (3)
or
(6)
occurred before
or after the coming into force of this section.
The Secretary of State must publish a list of persons that the Secretary of
State will consult about the making of a relevant appointment.
Different lists may be published in respect of different kinds of relevant
appointment.
The Secretary of State may revise any list published under this section (and
must publish any revised list).
Before making a relevant appointment, the Secretary of State must consult
the persons appearing on the relevant list.
In this section “relevant appointment” means an appointment under any of
the following—
section 5 (Commissioners);
section 6 (Directors of Investigations);
section 7 (judicial panel members);
section 10 (members of Victims and Survivors Advisory Group).
In this section “the relevant list” means the list published under this section
that applies to the relevant appointment in question.
The Legacy Commission, the persons mentioned in section 4 (1) (a) to (e) (members of the Commission) and the oversight board must not do anything which—
would risk damaging, or would damage, the national security interests
of the United Kingdom,
would risk putting, or would put, the life or safety of any person at
risk, or
would risk having, or would have, a prejudicial effect on any actual
or prospective criminal proceedings in any part of the United Kingdom.
The duty in
subsection (1)
also applies to a relevant Legacy Commission
officer who is carrying out work in connection with an investigation under
Part 3
or inquisitorial proceedings.
For the purposes of
subsection (1)
(c)
criminal proceedings are “prospective”
at any time if, in the view of the Legacy Commission, the proceedings are
likely to be brought within a reasonable period after that time.
For provision about the way in which
subsection (1)
operates in relation to
disclosures of information, see
section 20
(2)
to
(8)
.
In this section “relevant Legacy Commission officer” means a Legacy
Commission officer who is not a Director of Investigations or the Chief
Executive Officer.
The relevant persons must, in exercising functions under this Act, do so in a
way that is consistent with the following principles—
the principle that reconciliation should be promoted;
the principle that the rule of law should be upheld;
the principle that the suffering of victims and survivors should be
acknowledged;
the principle that the pursuit of justice and the recovery of information
should be facilitated;
the principle that human rights should be respected;
the principle that the approach to dealing with Northern Ireland’s
past should be balanced, proportionate, transparent, fair and equitable.
The relevant persons must also, in exercising functions under this Act, have
regard to the need to act—
independently,
impartially,
transparently,
objectively,
in a manner that establishes credibility,
with integrity,
professionally, and
consistently.
In this section “relevant person” means—
the Legacy Commission,
the oversight board, and
A relevant Legacy Commission officer must, in exercising a function under
this Act in connection with an investigation under
Part 3
or inquisitorial
proceedings, do so in a way that avoids any unnecessary cost.
In this section—
“
relevant Legacy Commission officer” has the meaning given by
section
12
;
“
unnecessary cost” means an unnecessary cost to public funds or to
witnesses or others.
A Director of Investigations is (by virtue of this subsection) designated as a
person having the powers and privileges of a constable.
A Director of Investigations may designate any other Legacy Commission
officer as a person having the powers and privileges of a constable, if they
are satisfied that the Legacy Commission officer—
is capable of effectively exercising those powers and privileges,
has received adequate training in respect of the exercise of those
powers and privileges, and
is otherwise a suitable person to exercise those powers and privileges.
The powers and privileges of a constable which a Legacy Commission officer
has by virtue of a designation under
this section
may be exercised only for
the purposes of, or in connection with, any relevant function.
In this section “relevant function” means a function of—
a Director of Investigations;
a judicial panel member.
Schedule 2
contains further provision about the operational powers of Legacy
Commission officers.
A relevant authority must make available to the Legacy Commission such
information, documents and other things as—
a Director of Investigations may require for the purposes of, or in
connection with, an investigation under
Part 3
allocated to them;
a judicial panel member may require for the purposes of, or in
connection with, inquisitorial proceedings allocated to them.
A relevant authority may also make available to the Legacy Commission any
information, documents and other things which, in the view of that authority,
may be needed for the purposes of, or in connection with, an investigation
under
Part 3
or inquisitorial proceedings.
Information required by a person to be made available under subsection (1) is to be made available in such manner and by such time as that person may require.
A document or other thing required by a person to be made available under subsection (1) is to be made available by such time as that person may require.
Subject to that, it is for the relevant authority and the relevant person to agree
the manner in which and time by which information, a document or other
thing is to be made available under this section.
A requirement under
subsection (3)
or
(4)
may (in particular) require, and an
agreement under
subsection (5)
may (in particular) provide, that the relevant
authority is to—
give the information, document or other thing to the Legacy
Commission;
give a copy of the information, document or other thing to the Legacy
Commission;
allow the Legacy Commission to access the information, document or
other thing while it is held by the relevant authority.
A requirement under
subsection (3)
or
(4)
(including anything required by
virtue of
subsection (6)
) must be consistent with any regulations under
section
24
.
A relevant person may require any of the following persons to give the Legacy
Commission such assistance as is reasonable for the purposes of, or in
connection with, the effective use of information, documents and other things
made available by that person under
this section
—
the Chief Constable of the PSNI;
any other chief officer of a police force;
the Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland;
the Director General of the Independent Office for Police Conduct;
the Police Investigations and Review Commissioner.
A relevant authority does not contravene—
any obligation of confidence owed by the relevant authority, or
any other restriction on the disclosure of information (however
imposed),
by making information, documents and other things available under
this
section
.
In this section “relevant person” means—
in relation to an investigation under
Part 3
, the Director of
Investigations to whom the investigation is allocated;
in relation to inquisitorial proceedings, the judicial panel member to
whom the proceedings are allocated.
In this Act “relevant authority” means any of the following—
the Chief Constable of the PSNI;
any other chief officer of a police force;
the Public Prosecution Service for Northern Ireland;
the Presiding coroner, appointed under
section 2A
of the
Coroners
Act (Northern Ireland) 1959
;
the Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland;
the Director General of the Independent Office for Police Conduct;
the Police Investigations and Review Commissioner;
any Minister of the Crown (within the meaning of the
Ministers of
the Crown Act 1975
);
the Security Service;
the Secret Intelligence Service;
GCHQ (within the meaning of the Intelligence Services Act 1994);
any other department of the United Kingdom government (including
a non-ministerial department);
a Northern Ireland department;
the Scottish Ministers;
any of the armed forces.
The powers conferred by subsections (2) to (4) may be exercised—
by a Director of Investigations, for the purposes of, or in connection
with, an investigation under
Part 3
allocated to them;
by a judicial panel member, for the purposes of, or in connection with,
inquisitorial proceedings allocated to them.
In the following provisions of this section, “the relevant person” means the person exercising those powers.
The relevant person may by notice require a person (P)—
to provide information through a specified live audio link or live video
link, at a specified time;
to attend at a specified time and place to provide information, but
only if the relevant person considers that it would be impracticable
for P to provide the information through a live audio link or live video
link.
The relevant person may by notice require a person to attend at a specified
time and place—
to produce any documents in the person’s custody or under the
person’s control;
to produce any other thing in the person’s custody or under the
person’s control for inspection, examination or testing.
The relevant person may by notice require a person, within a specified period
(appearing to the relevant person to be reasonable)—
to provide evidence in the form of a written statement;
to produce any documents in the person’s custody or under the
person’s control;
to produce any other thing in the person’s custody or under the
person’s control for inspection, examination or testing.
A notice under this section must—
explain the possible consequences of not complying with the notice;
indicate what the recipient of the notice should do to make a claim
under
subsection (6)
.
A claim by a person that—
the person is unable to comply with a notice under this section , or
it is not reasonable in all the circumstances to require the person to
comply with such a notice,
is to be determined by the relevant person, who may revoke or vary the notice on that ground (or leave it unchanged).
In deciding whether to revoke or vary a notice on the ground mentioned in
subsection (6)
(b)
, the relevant person must consider the public interest in the
information in question being obtained, having regard to the likely importance
of the information.
A claim by a relevant authority that the Legacy Commission or the relevant
person—
would contravene
section 12
(1)
(a)
or
(b)
if the person given a notice
under this section was required to comply with the notice, but
would not contravene
section 12
(1)
(a)
or
(b)
if a different person
nominated by the relevant authority were instead required to comply
with that notice,
is to be determined by the relevant person, who may vary the notice, so as to require the person nominated under paragraph (b) to comply with it, or revoke the notice (or leave it unchanged).
For the purposes of this section —
“live audio link” means a live telephone link or other arrangement
which enables the person providing information, and the person to
whom information is being provided, to hear each other;
“live video link” means a live television link or other arrangement
which enables the person providing information, and the person to
whom information is being provided, to see and hear each other;
“specified” means specified in a notice under this section;
a thing is under a person’s control if it is in the person’s possession
or if the person has a right to possession of it.
Information obtained by the relevant person or a Legacy Commission officer
under this section is to be—
treated (for the purposes of this Act, except
section 21
) as obtained by
the Legacy Commission, and
held by the Legacy Commission.
Schedule 3 makes provision about enforcement of notices under this section .
This section
applies in relation to criminal proceedings brought against a
person (D).
Compelled material obtained from D may not be used in evidence against
D.
Subsection (2)
does not apply in relation to proceedings against D for an
offence under
paragraph 8
(1)
(a)
of
Schedule 3
(distortion of evidence etc).
Any material that—
was provided by, or obtained from, D for the purposes of, or in
connection with, the exercise of any function of the Legacy
Commission, a Director of Investigations or a judicial panel member,
and
is not compelled material,
may not be used in evidence against D unless exception 1 or 2 applies in relation to the material.
Exception 1: the material was provided to, or obtained by, a Legacy
Commission officer designated under
section 15
.
Exception 2: the proceedings brought against D relate to—
the exercise by the Legacy Commission, a Director of Investigations
or a judicial panel member of any function,
any other conduct of the Legacy Commission,
the conduct of any current or former Commissioner, judicial panel
member, Legacy Commission officer or Legacy Commission contractor,
a person being appointed, or holding office, as a Commissioner,
Director of Investigations or judicial panel member, or
a person being employed or seconded as, or being, a Legacy
Commission officer.
Where
subsection (3)
or exception 1 or 2 applies in relation to the material,
this section
does not affect the application to that material of any other
legislation or rule of law relating to admissibility.
No evidence relating to any material inadmissible against D may be adduced,
and no question relating to any material inadmissible against D may be asked
by or on behalf of the prosecution, unless evidence relating to that material
is adduced, or a question relating to that material is asked, in the proceedings
by or on behalf of D.
This section
applies in relation to material, and evidence or questions relating
to material—
whether the material is in the form in which it was provided or
obtained, or in some other form;
whether the material (in whatever form) is in the possession of the
Legacy Commission or another person (whether obtained directly or
indirectly from the Legacy Commission).
In this section —
“compelled material” means anything that has been obtained by the Legacy Commission from a person through the exercise of the powers under section 17 ;
“material inadmissible against D”, in relation to criminal proceedings brought against D, means material that, by virtue of subsections (2) to (6) , may not be used in evidence against D.
In this Act—
“
sensitive information” means information which, if disclosed generally,
would risk damaging, or would damage, the national security interests
of the United Kingdom;
“
prejudicial information” means information which, if disclosed
generally—
would risk putting, or would put, the life or safety of any
person at risk, or
would risk having, or would have, a prejudicial effect on any
actual or prospective criminal proceedings in any part of the
United Kingdom,
(and criminal proceedings are “prospective” at any time if, in the view of the person considering whether information is prejudicial information, the proceedings are likely to be brought within a reasonable period after that time);
“
protected international information” means information which—
was supplied to any person by, or by an agency of, the
government of a country or territory outside the United
Kingdom, and
if disclosed generally might, in the opinion of the Secretary of
State, damage international relations.
Schedule 4
makes provision about the identification of sensitive, prejudicial
or protected international information.
The Legacy Commission may disclose any information held by it to any other
person.
A disclosure of information by the Legacy Commission (under this section
or any other power or duty) must not be made if any of prohibitions A to E
applies to the disclosure or information concerned.
But prohibitions A to D do not apply to a disclosure of information if it is
permitted by
Schedule 5
.
Prohibition A: the Legacy Commission has identified the information as
sensitive information (see
paragraph 1
of
Schedule 4
).
Prohibition B: a relevant authority has notified the Legacy Commission that
the information has been identified as sensitive information (see
paragraphs
2
and
3
of
Schedule 4
).
Prohibition C: the Secretary of State has notified the Legacy Commission that
the information has been identified as protected international information
(see
paragraph 5
of
Schedule 4
).
Prohibition D: the Legacy Commission would otherwise contravene the duty
imposed under
section 12
(1)
by making the disclosure.
Prohibition E: the disclosure is prohibited by any of Parts 1 to 7, or Chapter
1 of Part 9, of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016.
Subsection
(1)
is subject to any restriction notice or a restriction order (within
the meaning given by
section 64
(2)
) given or made in connection with
inquisitorial proceedings.
Schedule 5
sets out which disclosures are permitted for the purposes of
this
section
and makes provision about decisions to prohibit disclosures of sensitive
information.
Any function of the Legacy Commission under this section or Schedule 5 may be exercised on behalf of, and in the name of, the Legacy Commission by a Director of Investigations or a judicial panel member.
A person who is or was a relevant person commits an offence if—
the person discloses (in any part of the world) information which the
person obtained as a relevant person, and
the disclosure would, if it had been made by the Legacy Commission,
have contravened a relevant prohibition on disclosure.
In this section—
“
relevant person” means—
a Commissioner,
a Director of Investigations,
a judicial panel member,
the Chief Executive Officer,
a Legacy Commission contractor;
“
relevant prohibition on disclosure” means a prohibition on disclosure
of information imposed under
section 20
(2)
—
where any of prohibitions A to C in section 20 applies, or
where prohibition D in that section applies because the
disclosure contravenes the duty imposed under
section 12
(1)
(a)
or
(b)
.
Subsection
(1)
does not apply to the communication of information by a
person to another person in that other person’s capacity as a relevant person.
It is a defence for a person charged with an offence under this section to
prove that at the time of the alleged offence the person did not know, and
had no reasonable cause to believe, that the disclosure would, if it had been
made by the Legacy Commission, have contravened a relevant prohibition
on disclosure.
A person who commits an offence under this section is liable—
on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding
2 years or a fine (or both);
on summary conviction in Northern Ireland, to imprisonment for a
term not exceeding 6 months or a fine not exceeding the statutory
maximum (or both);
on summary conviction in England and Wales, to imprisonment for
a term not exceeding the general limit in a magistrates’ court or a fine
(or both);
on summary conviction in Scotland, to imprisonment for a term not
exceeding 12 months or a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum
(or both).
In this Act “Legacy Commission contractor” means a person providing, or
being employed in the provision of, goods or services for the purposes of the
Legacy Commission.
Information that has been obtained by the Legacy Commission—
under section 16 , or
through the exercise of police powers,
may be used by a relevant person only for the purposes of, or in connection with, the exercise of any relevant function.
Information that has been obtained by the Legacy Commission under
section
17
may be used by a relevant person only for the purposes of, or in connection
with, the exercise of a relevant function under
Part 3
or
4
.
Information or material that has been obtained by the Legacy Commission
as a result of assistance provided under an assistance agreement (within the
meaning of
section 44
) may be used by a relevant person only—
so far as the use is not prohibited by the assistance agreement.
Subsections (1)
to
(3)
do not authorise a relevant person to disclose information
to any person other than a relevant person.
Subsections (1) to (3) do not apply to any information once it has been—
contained in a final report produced in accordance with section 46 or 71 , or
published by the Legacy Commission (otherwise than in a final report)
in accordance with the provisions of this Act.
This section does not limit the application of section 12 .
In this section —
“
police powers” means the powers and privileges of a constable which
a Legacy Commission officer has by virtue of a designation under
section 15
;
“
relevant function” means a function of—
a Director of Investigations;
a judicial panel member;
“
relevant person” means—
the Legacy Commission;
a Director of Investigations;
a judicial panel member;
the oversight board;
a Legacy Commission officer.
The Secretary of State may give guidance about the exercise of functions in
accordance with
section 12
(1)
(a)
.
The Legacy Commission and other persons required to comply with
section
12
(1)
(a)
must have regard to any guidance given under
subsection (1)
in
exercising the functions to which the guidance relates.
An information disclosure protocol may be agreed between—
the Directors of Investigations acting jointly, and
one or more of—
the relevant authorities, and
the persons listed in paragraph 4 (2) of Schedule 5 .
An “information disclosure protocol” is a document dealing with a framework
for the disclosure of information by, or to, the Legacy Commission.
The Secretary of State may, by regulations, make provision about the holding
and handling of information by the Legacy Commission.
The regulations may (in particular)—
make provision about notifications to be given by the Legacy
Commission in respect of information held by the Legacy Commission;
make provision about measures for holding and handling information
securely (including physical, electronic, organisational or systemic
measures);
in relation to information which is to cease to be held by the Legacy
Commission, make provision about the destruction or transfer of the
information;
make provision about guidance or consultation;
confer functions on the Secretary of State or any other person (as well
as on the Legacy Commission);
create criminal offences.
The information about which the regulations may make provision includes
information which (in accordance with
Schedule 4
)—
the Legacy Commission has identified as prejudicial information or
sensitive information,
a relevant authority has identified as, and notified the Legacy
Commission as being, prejudicial information or sensitive information,
or
the Secretary of State has identified as, and notified the Legacy
Commission as being, protected international information.
A criminal offence created under subsection (2) (f) —
may only apply to the conduct of a person who is or has been—
a Commissioner,
a Director of Investigations,
a judicial panel member,
the Chief Executive Officer,
a Legacy Commission officer not within sub-paragraph (ii) or (iv) , or
a Legacy Commission contractor;
may not impose a penalty that is greater than a penalty that may be
imposed for an offence under
section 21
.
Regulations under this section are subject to negative procedure.
The Secretary of State may by regulations—
designate a collection of biometric material, or part of such a collection,
for the purposes of
this section
;
provide for biometric material in designated collections not to be
destroyed if destruction of the material would otherwise be required
by any of the destruction provisions;
provide for preserved material to be retained;
provide for preserved material to be used for the purposes of, or in
connection with, the exercise of any relevant function;
provide for preserved material to be destroyed.
If regulations provide for the retention of preserved material, the Secretary
of State must, by regulations, require—
that periodic reviews of the need to retain the material are carried out
by the Legacy Commission;
that the material is destroyed by no later than the end of a reasonable
period after the exercise of relevant functions ceases.
Regulations made under this section are subject to negative procedure.
In this section —
“biometric material” means a record of—
a DNA profile based on a DNA sample taken before 31 October
2013, or
fingerprints taken before 31 October 2013;
“destruction provisions” means—
Article 63B
of the
Police and Criminal Evidence (Northern
Ireland) Order 1989
(S.I. 1989/1341 (N.I. 12)),
any provision of Part 1 of Schedule 8 to the Terrorism Act 2000 which requires the destruction of biometric material,
any provision of
sections 18
to
18E
of the
Counter-Terrorism
Act 2008
which requires the destruction of biometric material,
any provision of
Schedule 6
to the
Terrorism Prevention and
Investigation Measures Act 2011
which requires the destruction
of biometric material,
section 18G of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995 , and
section 18
(3)
to
(5)
of the
Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act
1995
as applied by
paragraph 7
of
Schedule 4
to the
International Criminal Court (Scotland) Act 2001
(asp 13);
“preserved material” means biometric material in a designated collection which, by virtue of regulations made under subsection (1) (b) , has not been destroyed (as would otherwise have been required by any of the destruction provisions);
At least 3 months before the start of a financial year, the Legacy Commission
must—
produce and publish a work plan for that year, and
give a copy of the plan to the Secretary of State.
A work plan must deal with the following matters—
the caseload which the Legacy Commission is expecting;
the plans which the Legacy Commission has for dealing with its
caseload;
the plans which the Legacy Commission has for engaging with persons
entitled to make requests for investigations under
Part 3
;
policies which the Legacy Commission is planning to introduce, review
or change;
such other matters as the Legacy Commission considers appropriate.
Within 6 months of the end of a financial year, the Legacy Commission must—
produce and publish an annual report in relation to that year, and
give a copy of the annual report to the Secretary of State.
An annual report must deal with the following matters—
the finances of the Legacy Commission;
the administration of the Legacy Commission;
the volume of information received by the Legacy Commission in that
year;
the number of requests for investigations under
Part 3
that have been
made in that year;
the number of investigations under
Part 3
initiated by the Directors
of Investigations in that year;
the number of final reports on the findings of investigations under Part 3 that have been published in that year;
the number of inquisitorial proceedings that are active (within the
meaning given by
section 37
(6)
(b)
) in that year;
the number of final reports on the findings of inquisitorial proceedings
that have been published in that year;
such other matters as the Legacy Commission considers appropriate.
“Financial year”, in relation to the Legacy Commission, means each period
of one year which ends with 31 March.
His Majesty’s Inspectors of Constabulary (“the inspectorate”) must from time
to time carry out inspections of the Legacy Commission.
The Secretary of State may require the inspectorate to carry out an inspection
of the Legacy Commission—
generally, or
as regards a particular matter.
The duty in
section 12
(1)
(safeguards) applies to the inspectorate in the exercise
of the inspectorate’s functions of inspection and reporting under this Part
(“the relevant functions”).
Paragraph 2
, other than sub-paragraph (7)(b), and paragraph
5
of
Schedule
4A
to the
Police Act 1996
(inspection programmes and inspection frameworks)
apply to the relevant functions as they apply to other functions of inspection
and reporting.
The inspectorate may require the Secretary of State to pay reasonable costs
incurred (or to be incurred) by the inspectorate in connection with the exercise
of the relevant functions.
The Legacy Commission is not to be inspected under this section, and its
efficiency and effectiveness is not to be reported on under
section 29
, as
regards its functions—
in connection with inquisitorial proceedings, or
The inspectorate may exercise the powers in this section for the purposes of,
or in connection with, an inspection under
section 27
.
The Legacy Commission must make available to the inspectorate such
information, documents and other things as the inspectorate may require.
Information required by the inspectorate to be made available under
subsection
(2)
is to be made available in such manner and by such time as the
inspectorate may require.
A document or other thing required by the inspectorate to be made available
under
subsection (2)
is to be made available by such time as the inspectorate
may require.
Subject to that, it is for the Legacy Commission and the inspectorate to agree
the manner in which and time by which information, a document or other
thing is to be made available under this section.
A requirement under
subsection (3)
or
(4)
may (in particular) require, and an
agreement under
subsection (5)
may (in particular) provide, that the Legacy
Commission is to—
give the information, document or other thing to the inspectorate;
give a copy of the information, document or other thing to the
inspectorate;
allow the inspectorate to access the information, document or other
thing while it is held by the Legacy Commission.
The inspectorate may require the Legacy Commission to secure that the
inspectorate is given access (at such time as may be specified by the
inspectorate) to—
premises occupied for the purposes of the Legacy Commission, and
documents and other things on those premises.
The Legacy Commission is not required to comply with a requirement
imposed—
under subsection (2) , (3) or (4) before it is practicable to do so;
under
subsection (7)
at the specified time where there are reasonable
grounds for not complying at that time (in which case the Legacy
Commission must comply at a time specified by the inspectorate after
there cease to be any such grounds).
This section applies where the inspectorate has carried out an inspection
under
section 27
.
The inspectorate must produce a report about the Legacy Commission’s
efficiency and effectiveness—
generally, or
in the case of an inspection under
section 27
(2)
(b)
, as regards the
matter to which the inspection related.
Before producing the report, the inspectorate must—
give a draft of the report to the Secretary of State, and
when giving the draft, identify any sensitive information or protected
international information in the draft which was disclosed to the
inspectorate by the Legacy Commission.
The Secretary of State may require the inspectorate to exclude from the
report—
any sensitive information or protected international information, and
anything which, if published, the Secretary of State considers—
would risk damaging, or would damage, the national security
interests of the United Kingdom,
would risk putting, or would put, the life or safety of any
person at risk, or
would risk having, or would have, a prejudicial effect on any
actual or prospective criminal proceedings in any part of the
United Kingdom.
If the Secretary of State decides not to impose a requirement under
subsection
(4)
, they must notify the inspectorate of that fact.
After excluding from the report anything which the Secretary of State requires
to be excluded, or being notified under
subsection (5)
in relation to the report,
the inspectorate must—
give the report to the Secretary of State and the Legacy Commission,
and
publish the report.
The Legacy Commission must—
prepare a document setting out its response to the report, and
publish its response before the end of the period of 56 days beginning
with the day on which the report is given to it under
subsection (6)
(a)
.
If the report includes a recommendation, the Legacy Commission’s response
must include an explanation of—
the action that it has taken or proposes to take in response to the
recommendation, or
why it has not taken and does not propose to take any action in
response.
The inspectorate must not publish the report or give it to any person except
in accordance with this section.
The inspectorate must not, in publishing the report, contravene a restriction
notice or a restriction order (within the meaning given by
section 64
(2)
) given
or made in connection with inquisitorial proceedings.
For the purposes of
subsection (4)
(b)
(iii)
criminal proceedings are “prospective”
at any time if, in the view of the Secretary of State, the proceedings are likely
to be brought within a reasonable period after that time.
Where the Legacy Commission discloses sensitive information or protected
international information to the inspectorate (as permitted by
Schedule 5
),
the inspectorate may not disclose the information except as permitted by this
section.
The inspectorate may disclose the information to the Secretary of State in a
draft of a report given under
section 29
(2)
.
The inspectorate may disclose the information in a report published under
section 29
(6)
if the Secretary of State does not require the inspectorate to
exclude the information; but this is subject to
section 29
(10)
.
On completion of the review, the appointed person must give a report, setting
out the result of the review, to the Secretary of State and the Legacy
Commission.
As soon as practicable after receiving a report, the Legacy Commission must
give to the Secretary of State a document setting out its response to the report.
The Secretary of State must lay a copy of the report, and the response to it,
before Parliament.
The Secretary of State may make payments to a person appointed under this
section.
In this section “independent person” means a person appearing to the Secretary
of State to be independent of the Secretary of State and the Legacy
Commission.
In this section “relevant day” means the day that is—
2 years after the day on which this Act is passed,
5 years after that day, or
7 years after that day.
The Secretary of State may, by regulations, make provision for winding up
the Legacy Commission if the Secretary of State is satisfied that the need for
the exercise of the functions of the Legacy Commission, Directors of
Investigations and judicial panel members has ceased.
Regulations under
subsection (1)
may (in particular) make provision for the
transfer of property, rights and liabilities (whether or not otherwise capable
of being transferred), including any acquired or arising after the regulations
are made.
Regulations under
subsection (1)
may (in particular) repeal or otherwise
amend any provision of this Part other than—
section 21
and the following provisions (which relate to the offence
under that section)—
section 12 (1) (a) and (b) ;
section 20 (2) to (7) and (10) ;
Regulations under subsection (1) may repeal or otherwise amend section 38 or 40 of the Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023 .
The consequential provision that may (by virtue of
section 112
(5)
(b)
) be made
by regulations under
subsection (1)
includes consequential amendments of—
any primary legislation other than this Act.
“Primary legislation” has the meaning given by section 111 .
The Secretary of State must consult the required consultees, and take into
account the annual reports produced by the Legacy Commission (see
section
26
) and the reports under
section 31
on the performance of functions—
when deciding whether to exercise the power to make regulations
conferred by
subsection (1)
, and
before making regulations under subsection (1) .
Before making regulations under
subsection (1)
, the Secretary of State must
publish a report setting out—
the names of the persons consulted under subsection (6) ,
a summary of the views expressed on the consultation, and
an explanation of why the Secretary of State is satisfied as mentioned
in
subsection (1)
.
Regulations under subsection (1) are subject to affirmative procedure.
If a draft of an instrument containing regulations under
subsection (1)
would,
apart from
this subsection
, be treated for the purposes of the Standing Orders
of either House of Parliament as a hybrid instrument, it is to proceed in that
House as if it were not a hybrid instrument.
In this section “the required consultees” means—
the Legacy Commission, and
any other person the Secretary of State considers it appropriate to
consult.
The Legacy Commission must publish a statement—
setting out how functions under this Part are to be exercised by the
Legacy Commission, the Directors of Investigations and other Legacy
Commission officers, and
explaining how exercising those functions in that way will secure
public confidence in the Commission’s work.
The statement must (in particular) set out how the functions under the
following provisions are to be exercised—
section 41
(3)
(consulting family members and others about allocation
of investigations).
The Legacy Commission must keep under review any statement published
under
subsection (1)
, and may from time to time publish a revised statement.
The Legacy Commission, a Director of Investigations or other Legacy
Commission officer must, when exercising any function under this Part, have
regard to any statement published under
subsection (1)
.
Where a person’s death was caused directly by conduct forming part of the
Troubles, an investigation under
this Part
of the conduct may be requested
by—
a close family member of the deceased (see section 113 ), or
if there are no close family members, a family member of the deceased.
Where conduct forming part of the Troubles caused a person to suffer serious
physical or mental harm, the person may request an investigation under
this
Part
of the conduct.
“Serious physical or mental harm” means—
paraplegia;
quadriplegia;
severe brain injury or damage;
severe psychiatric damage;
total blindness;
total deafness;
loss of one or more limbs;
severe scarring or disfigurement.
A request under this section may not be made after the specified day.
“The specified day” is the last day in the period of five years beginning with
the day on which this section comes into force for all purposes.
In
this section
“harmful conduct forming part of the Troubles” means conduct
forming part of the Troubles that—
caused a person’s death, or
caused a person to suffer physical or mental harm.
The Secretary of State may request an investigation under
this Part
of harmful
conduct forming part of the Troubles.
Any of the persons listed in subsection (5) may request an investigation under this Part of harmful conduct forming part of the Troubles if—
they consider that the request condition is met, and
a person’s death was caused directly by the conduct or the conduct
caused a person to suffer serious physical or mental harm.
Those persons who may request an investigation are—
the Chief Constable of the PSNI;
any other chief officer of a police force;
the Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland;
the Director General of the Independent Office for Police Conduct;
the Police Investigations and Review Commissioner;
an inquiry panel within the meaning of the Inquiries Act 2005 (see section 3 of that Act).
The “request condition” is met if—
the investigation is necessary for the purposes of ECHR compatibility,
or
owing to new evidence (known or reasonably suspected to exist), there
is a realistic prospect of information obtained through the investigation
being provided to a prosecutor under
section 51
.
An investigation is “necessary for the purposes of ECHR compatibility” where
the United Kingdom would contravene Article 2 or 3 of the Convention
(within the meaning of the
Human Rights Act 1998
) if the investigation were
not carried out.
The Director of Public Prosecutions for Northern Ireland may request an
investigation under
this Part
of harmful conduct forming part of the Troubles
if—
the Director receives a written report from a coroner under
section
35
(3)
of the
Justice (Northern Ireland) Act 2002
which relates to the
conduct, or
the conduct has been referred to the Director by a judicial panel
member under
section 70
(2)
.
The Director of Public Prosecutions (for England and Wales) may request an
investigation under
this Part
of harmful conduct forming part of the Troubles
if—
the Director receives a written report from a coroner which—
relates to the conduct, and
concerns the circumstances of any death which is being, or has
been, investigated by the coroner and appear to the coroner to
disclose that an offence may have been committed against the
law of any country or territory, or
the conduct has been referred to the Director by a judicial panel
member under
section 70
(3)
.
The Lord Advocate may request an investigation under
this Part
of harmful
conduct forming part of the Troubles if the conduct has been referred to the
Lord Advocate by a judicial panel member under
section 70
(4)
.
Where a person’s death was caused directly by conduct forming part of the
Troubles, an investigation under
this Part
of the conduct may be requested
by—
the Attorney General for Northern Ireland,
the Advocate General for Northern Ireland, if
section 14
(3)
of the
Coroners Act (Northern Ireland) 1959
applies in relation to the death
(inquest on orders of Advocate General if national security involved),
the coroner in Northern Ireland who was responsible for an inquest
into that death which was closed in accordance with
section 16A
(3)
of
that Act
,
the senior coroner in England and Wales who was responsible for
conducting an investigation under
Part 1
of the
Coroners and Justice
Act 2009
into that death which was discontinued in accordance with
paragraph 1
(3)
of
Schedule 1A
to
that Act
,
the Chief Coroner of England and Wales, if the Chief Coroner is
prohibited by
paragraph 2
(4)
of
Schedule 1A
to
that Act
from directing
a senior coroner to conduct an investigation under
Part 1
of
that Act
into the death,
the sheriff in Scotland who was responsible for conducting an inquiry
under the
Inquiries into Fatal Accidents and Sudden Deaths etc.
(Scotland) Act 2016
(asp 2) into that death which was discontinued in
accordance with
paragraph 1
(3)
of
Schedule A1
to
that Act
,
the procurator fiscal in Scotland who was responsible for conducting
an investigation under
that Act
into that death which was discontinued
in accordance with
paragraph 1
(4)
(b)
of
Schedule A1
to
that Act
, or
the Lord Advocate, if the Lord Advocate is prohibited by
paragraph
2
(a)
of
Schedule A1
to
that Act
from exercising functions so as to cause
an inquiry under
that Act
to be held into the death.
A request under
this section
may not be made after the specified day (within
the meaning of
section 34
(5)
) unless the person making the request considers
that the request condition (set out in
subsection (6)
) is met.
Section 34
(3)
(meaning of “serious physical or mental harm”) applies for the
purposes of
this section
.
A request under
section 34
or
35
for an investigation may include particular
questions about the conduct to which the investigation will relate.
The Directors of Investigations acting jointly must decide—
the form and manner in which requests under
section 34
or
35
are to
be made, and
the circumstances (if any) in which requests under section 34 or 35 may be changed (including by changing particular questions included in requests) or withdrawn.
This section applies where an investigation is requested under section 34 or 35 .
The Directors of Investigations acting jointly (“the Directors”) must accept
the request, subject to the following subsections.
The Directors must reject the request if—
it is made under
section 35
after the specified day (within the meaning
of
section 34
(5)
) and the Directors consider that the request condition
(set out in
section 35
(6)
) is not met.
The Directors may reject the request if—
it is not made in the required form or manner,
it is made under
section 34
(1)
(b)
by a family member other than a
close family member and the Directors consider that it is inappropriate
for that family member to make the request,
it is made under
section 34
(2)
and is a request for an investigation of
conduct that is linked to active inquisitorial proceedings or an active
resumed inquest,
it is a request for an investigation of conduct that is linked to
inquisitorial proceedings that are no longer active or a resumed inquest
that is no longer active,
it is made under section 35 (4) , (8) , (9) or (10) , or
it is a subsequent request (see section 38 ).
In deciding whether to accept a request of the kind described in subsection (4) (c) or (d) , the Directors—
must take into account the inquisitorial proceedings or resumed
inquest, and
must (in particular) ensure that the Legacy Commission does not do
anything which duplicates any aspect of the proceedings or inquest
unless, in the Directors’ view, the duplication is essential.
For the purposes of this section—
conduct is “linked” to inquisitorial proceedings or a resumed inquest
if the conduct caused the death to which the proceedings or inquest
relates;
inquisitorial proceedings are “active” during the period—
beginning with the allocation of the proceedings to a judicial
panel member under
section 58
, and
ending with the publication of the report on the findings of
the proceedings under
section 74
;
a “resumed inquest” is an inquest resumed in accordance with—
section 16AA of the Coroners Act (Northern Ireland) 1959, or
a direction given to the Presiding coroner under section 16AB of that Act;
a resumed inquest is “active” during the period—
beginning with the coming into force of
section 16AA
of the
Coroners Act (Northern Ireland) 1959 or the giving of the
direction under
section 16AB
of that Act (as is relevant to the
inquest), and
ending with the final determination, verdict or findings being
made or given at the inquest or
section 58
applying to the
death to which the inquest relates by virtue of
section 58
(2)
(c)
.
This section applies where—
a request under
section 34
or
35
for an investigation of conduct forming
part of the Troubles has been made which has not yet been accepted
or rejected,
an investigation under
this Part
of such conduct is being carried out,
or
an investigation under this Part of such conduct has been carried out,
and a further request (“the subsequent request”) is made which relates to the same conduct.
Subsection (3) applies where the request is a subsequent request by virtue of subsection (1) (a) .
The Directors of Investigations acting jointly must decide how the subsequent
request is to be dealt with; and they may (in particular) decide that—
the person who made the subsequent request is to be treated as if
they had joined in the making of the earlier request, and
questions included in the subsequent request are to be treated as if
they had been included in the earlier request.
Subsection (5)
applies where the request is a subsequent request by virtue of
subsection (1)
(b)
and the investigation which is being carried out is pursuant
to an earlier request under
section 34
or
35
.
The relevant Director of Investigations must decide how the subsequent
request is to be dealt with; and they may (in particular) decide that—
the person who made the subsequent request is to be treated as if
they had joined in the making of the earlier request, and
questions included in the subsequent request are to be treated as if
they had been included in the earlier request.
Subsection (7)
applies where the request is a subsequent request by virtue of
subsection (1)
(b)
and the investigation which is being carried out was initiated
under
section 39
.
The relevant Director of Investigations must decide how the subsequent
request is to be dealt with; and they may (in particular) decide that—
the person who made the subsequent request, and
the questions included in the subsequent request,
are to be treated as if the investigation were being carried out pursuant to the subsequent request.
Subsection (9) applies where the request is a subsequent request by virtue of subsection (1) (c) .
The Directors of Investigations acting jointly must decide how the subsequent
request is to be dealt with; and, in doing so, they—
must take into account the investigation that has already been carried
out, and
must (in particular) ensure that the Legacy Commission does not do
anything which duplicates any aspect of that investigation unless, in
the Directors’ view, the duplication is essential.
Section 55
includes provision about conflicts of interest that applies in relation
to this section.
In this Act “the relevant Director of Investigations”, in relation to an
investigation under
this Part
, means the Director of Investigations to whom
the investigation is allocated under
section 41
.
The Directors of Investigations acting jointly may initiate an investigation
under
this Part
of harmful conduct forming part of the Troubles (“the relevant
conduct”) where it appears to the Directors that—
the investigation is necessary for the purposes of ECHR compatibility,
owing to new evidence (known or reasonably suspected to exist), there
is a realistic prospect of information obtained through the investigation
being provided to a prosecutor under
section 51
, or
the relevant conduct is linked with an investigation under this Part which is being, or has been, carried out.
The circumstances where the relevant conduct is “linked” with an investigation
under
this Part
include—
where the relevant conduct forms part of the same event as the conduct
to which the investigation relates;
where there is evidence that the same individual carried out or
otherwise caused the relevant conduct and the conduct to which the
investigation relates.
An investigation of the relevant conduct may not be initiated under this
section if the conduct is linked to active inquisitorial proceedings or an active
resumed inquest (and
section 37
(6)
applies for the purposes of this subsection).
In this section “harmful conduct forming part of the Troubles” and an
investigation being “necessary for the purposes of ECHR compatibility” have
the same meanings as in
section 35
.
This section applies where—
a request under
section 35
(by a public authority) for an investigation
is accepted, or
an investigation is initiated under section 39 .
The relevant Director of Investigations must take reasonable steps to identify—
if a person’s death was caused by relevant conduct, each close family
member of the deceased (see
section 113
),
if there are no close family members of a person whose death was
caused by relevant conduct, a family member of the deceased,
if a person was caused to suffer serious physical or mental harm by
relevant conduct, that person,
if a person caused to suffer serious physical or mental harm by relevant
conduct has subsequently died, each close family member of that
person, and
if there are no close family members of that person, a family member
of that person.
The relevant Director of Investigations must notify the following about the
investigation—
each person identified in accordance with subsection (2) (a) , (c) and (d) ,
the person (if any) identified in accordance with
subsection (2)
(b)
or
(e)
, if the Director considers it would be appropriate to notify the
person, and
the Secretary of State, if the investigation was initiated under
section
39
.
For the purposes of this section—
“relevant conduct” is the conduct to which the investigation mentioned
in
subsection (1)
(a)
or
(b)
(as the case may be) relates;
section 34 (3) (meaning of “serious physical or mental harm”) applies.
This section applies where—
a request under section 34 or 35 for an investigation is accepted, or
an investigation is initiated under section 39 .
The Chief Executive Officer must allocate the investigation to a Director of
Investigations.
Before doing so, the Chief Executive Officer must consult the following about
the proposed allocation—
except where the investigation is initiated under
section 39
, the person
who requested the investigation, and
any other person previously notified under
section 40
about the
investigation.
The Chief Executive Officer, when consulting a person under subsection (3) , must also allow the person to make representations about any matter that the person considers is relevant to the application of sections 53 to 55 (identifying and dealing with conflicts of interest) in relation to the investigation.
The Directors of Investigations acting jointly (“the Directors”) must determine—
the order in which investigations are to be carried out under this Part , and
the use of other Legacy Commission officers and other resources in
connection with those investigations.
In doing so, the Directors must have regard to whether an investigation is
necessary for the purposes of ECHR compatibility (within the meaning of
section 35
(7)
).
The other matters that the Directors must have regard to when making the
decisions described in
subsection (1)
in relation to an investigation include—
whether information obtained through the investigation is likely to be
provided to a prosecutor under
section 51
or whether the investigation
is likely to lead only to the production of a final report,
the extent to which the investigation is in the public interest,
where the investigation is requested under
section 34
, the date of the
request, and
except where the investigation is requested under
section 34
, the views
of any person who—
may request, under
section 34
, an investigation of the conduct
to which the investigation relates, and
is known to the Legacy Commission or a Director of
Investigations by virtue of any function under this Act.
After accepting a request under
section 34
or
35
for an investigation, the
Directors must, as soon as practicable, consider whether the investigation is
necessary for the purposes of ECHR compatibility (if not previously considered
by the Directors).
This section applies where an investigation is allocated to a Director of
Investigations under
section 41
.
The Director must decide whether or not the investigation is to be carried
out as a criminal investigation.
For that purpose, the Director must decide that the investigation is to be
carried out as a criminal investigation unless the Director considers that there
is no realistic prospect of information obtained through the investigation
being provided to a prosecutor under
section 51
.
Even if the investigation is not to be carried out as a criminal investigation,
the Legacy Commission must (so far as is practicable) determine the facts of
the conduct to which the investigation relates.
The Director has operational control over the conduct of the investigation by
the Legacy Commission.
The Director must ensure that—
the Legacy Commission carries out the investigation, and
the investigation examines all the circumstances of the conduct to
which it relates, including any Troubles-related offences which relate
to, or are otherwise connected with, that conduct.
The Director must decide how the investigation is to be carried out, including
by deciding what steps are necessary in carrying out the investigation.
In deciding what steps are necessary, the Director—
must take into account any investigation (of any kind, including an
inquest) that has previously been carried out in relation to the conduct
to which the investigation relates, and
must (in particular) ensure that the Legacy Commission does not do
anything which duplicates any aspect of any such previous
investigation unless, in the Director’s view, the duplication is essential.
In deciding what steps are necessary, the Director must (in particular) have
regard to the following matters so far as they are relevant—
any particular questions included in the request for the investigation,
and
whether information obtained through the investigation will be, or is
likely to be, provided to a prosecutor under
section 51
, or whether
the investigation will, or is likely to, lead only to the production of a
final report.
Before imposing requirements under
section 17
on witnesses, the Director
must—
in respect of each relevant authority, determine whether a requirement
under
section 16
(full disclosure by relevant authorities) should be
imposed on the authority for the purposes of the investigation,
impose each such requirement that the Director determines should be
imposed, and
ensure that the information, documents and other things made
available in response to each such requirement imposed are reviewed.
In deciding whether to impose a requirement under
section 17
on a witness,
the Director must, in addition to complying with
subsection (8)
(b)
(where
relevant) and
section 81
(welfare of witnesses), give particular weight to—
whether compelling new evidence is known or reasonably suspected
to exist, and
the likelihood of the witness being able to provide information further
to that already obtained by the Legacy Commission.
The Director must ensure that, in the carrying out of the investigation, regard
is had to the context in which—
the conduct to which the investigation relates occurred, and
any earlier criminal investigation of that conduct occurred.
If the Director considers that the investigation should be carried out in
conjunction with—
another investigation under
this Part
also allocated to the Director,
the Director may decide to do so;
another investigation under
this Part
allocated to the other Director
of Investigations, the Directors of Investigations acting jointly may
decide to do so.
Section 55
includes provision about conflicts of interest that applies in relation
to
subsection (13)
(b)
.
For the purposes of this section—
“Troubles-related offence” means an offence under the law of Northern
Ireland, England and Wales or Scotland where the conduct constituting
the offence was to any extent conduct forming part of the Troubles;
an offence is to be regarded as connected with conduct (in particular)
if the offence formed part of the same event as that conduct.
The Directors of Investigations acting jointly may make an agreement with
the chief officer of a police force for the provision, by the chief officer, of
assistance in relation to investigations under this Part which are carried out
as criminal investigations.
Where an investigation under this Part is being (or to be) carried out as a
criminal investigation, the relevant Director of Investigations may make an
agreement with the chief officer of a police force for the provision, by the
chief officer, of assistance in relation to the investigation (as a criminal
investigation).
An agreement under
subsection (1)
or
(2)
(an “assistance agreement”) may
provide for the Legacy Commission to make payments to the chief officer in
respect of costs incurred in connection with the provision of assistance under
the agreement.
An assistance agreement may be made only if the Directors of Investigations
are, or the relevant Director of Investigations is, satisfied that the agreement
contains provision to secure that—
when acting for the purposes of an assistance agreement, a relevant
person—
does not do anything within
section 12
(1)
(actions damaging
national security etc),
acts in a way that is consistent with the principles mentioned
in
section 13
(1)
, and
has regard to the welfare of any person who gives evidence
to or otherwise participates in a relevant investigation, and
arrangements are in place to identify cases where—
a relevant person may have a conflict of interest in relation to
a relevant investigation, or
a matter may otherwise affect the ability of a relevant person
to carry out work in connection with a relevant investigation
fairly and impartially,
and to ensure that in such cases the relevant person does not carry out work (or further work) in connection with the investigation.
An assistance agreement may be made only with the consent of the oversight
board.
Assistance may be sought under an assistance agreement only if the relevant
Director of Investigations considers—
that there is a realistic prospect of obtaining, as a result of the
assistance, information or material which could be given to a
prosecutor under
section 51
, and
that there is no realistic prospect of obtaining the information or
material without assistance being provided.
A relevant person must not, when acting for the purposes of an assistance
agreement, do anything which a Director of Investigations could not lawfully
do.
In this section—
“relevant investigation”, in relation to an assistance agreement, means
an investigation for which assistance is to be, or is being, provided
under the agreement;
“relevant person”, in relation to an assistance agreement, means the
chief officer with whom the agreement is made or anyone under their
direction and control;
a reference to the chief officer of a police force includes the Director
General of the National Crime Agency.
This section applies where a Director of Investigations decides that an
investigation under
this Part
which has been allocated to the Director is not
to be carried out as a criminal investigation (see
section 43
(2)
and
(3)
).
If the investigation was requested under
section 34
, the Director must notify
the person who requested the investigation about the decision.
If the investigation was requested under
section 35
, the Director must notify
the following about the decision—
the person who requested the investigation, and
any other person previously notified under
section 40
in relation to
the investigation.
If the investigation was initiated under
section 39
, the Director must notify
any person previously notified under
section 40
in relation to the investigation
about the decision.
Subsection (6) applies where—
the investigation was requested under
section 34
(2)
by a seriously
injured person who has subsequently died, or
a seriously injured person, previously identified under section 40 (2) (c) and notified under section 40 (3) (a) in connection with the investigation, has subsequently died.
The Director must—
take reasonable steps to identify each close family member of the
deceased (see
section 113
),
if there are no close family members of the deceased, take reasonable
steps to identify a family member of the deceased, and
notify the following about the decision—
each close family member identified in accordance with paragraph (a) , or
the person (if any) identified in accordance with paragraph (b) , if the Director considers it would be appropriate to notify the person.
Where—
a notification is given under this section, and
the Director subsequently decides that the investigation is to be carried
out as a criminal investigation,
the Director must notify any person previously notified under this section in relation to the investigation about the decision.
This section applies where the Legacy Commission has carried out an
investigation under
this Part
.
The Chief Executive Officer must appoint a judicial panel member to produce
a final report on the findings of the investigation.
The appointed judicial panel member must produce the final report.
The final report must be as comprehensive as possible, having regard to—
the need for the report to be accessible to the public, and
the duties imposed by sections 12 (1) and 20 (2) .
If particular questions were included in the request for the investigation (see section 36 (1) ), the final report must include—
the Legacy Commission’s response to those questions, so far as it has
been practicable to respond to them in carrying out the investigation;
for each question to which it has not been practicable to respond, a
statement of that outcome.
The final report must include a statement of the manner in which the
investigation was carried out.
In this Part “final report” means a report under this section.
This section applies where a judicial panel member has been appointed to
produce a final report under
section 46
on the findings of an investigation.
Before producing the final report, or giving a draft of the report or other
material to any person under
section 48
, the judicial panel member must give
a draft of the report to—
the Secretary of State, and
any relevant authority that—
made prejudicial information or sensitive information available
under
section 16
in connection with the investigation, or
identified information as prejudicial information or sensitive
information under
paragraph 2
or
3
of
Schedule 4
in connection
with the investigation.
The judicial panel member must, during the applicable response period, allow
a person who is given a draft of the report under this section to make
representations about whether the publication of the final report by the Legacy
Commission would cause it to contravene
section 12
(1)
or
20
(2)
.
“Applicable response period”, in relation to a person who is given a draft of
the report under this section, means—
the period of 60 days beginning with the day on which the draft is
given to the person, or
if the Secretary of State is satisfied that there is good reason to extend
the period, such longer period as the Secretary of State determines
and notifies to the judicial panel member before the end of the period
of 60 days.
The judicial panel member must notify the person of any period extended under paragraph (b) .
The judicial panel member must not produce the final report, or give a draft
of the report or other material to any person under
section 48
, until after the
applicable response period has ended (or all of the applicable response periods
have ended).
If representations are made in accordance with this section, the judicial panel
member must—
in producing the final report, or preparing a draft of the report or
other material to be given to a person under
section 48
, take the
representations into account, and
before giving a draft of the report or other material to any person
under
section 48
, notify the person who made the representations
about how the representations have been taken into account.
See also
paragraph 5
of
Schedule 5
for provision about decisions by the
Secretary of State to prohibit the disclosure of sensitive information in final
reports (and see
Part 2
of
that Schedule
for appeals against those decisions).
This section applies where—
a judicial panel member has been appointed to produce a final report
under
section 46
on the findings of an investigation, and
they have complied with all applicable duties imposed under
section
47
.
Before producing the final report, the judicial panel member must give a draft
of the report to—
except where the investigation was initiated under
section 39
, the
person who requested the investigation,
all relevant family members of any person whose death was caused
by the conduct to which the investigation relates, and
any person caused to suffer serious physical or mental harm by that
conduct or, where such a person has subsequently died, all relevant
family members of the person.
The judicial panel member must allow a person who is given a draft of the
report under
subsection (2)
to make representations about the report during
the applicable response period.
The judicial panel member is not required to give a draft of the report to a
person under
subsection (2)
(b)
or
(c)
if that person has informed the judicial
panel member or the relevant Director of Investigations that they do not wish
to receive it.
For the purposes of this section, a person (F) is a “relevant family member”
of a person (D) who has died if—
F is a close family member of D (see
section 113
) whom the relevant
Director of Investigations has identified after taking such steps as the
judicial panel member considers reasonable, or
in a case where no close family members are identified after taking
such steps, F is another member of the family of D whom—
the relevant Director of Investigations has identified after taking
such steps as the judicial panel member considers reasonable,
and
the judicial panel member considers it appropriate to be given
the opportunity to make representations.
If it is proposed to include in the final report material criticising an individual,
the judicial panel member must, before producing the report—
give a copy of that material to the individual, and
allow the individual to make representations about that material during
the applicable response period.
If it is proposed to include in the final report material criticising a public
authority, the judicial panel member must, before producing the report—
give a copy of that material to the public authority or to a person who,
in the judicial panel member’s view, currently has responsibility for
the public authority, and
allow that public authority or person to make representations about
that material during the applicable response period.
Subsection (7)
applies even if the public authority has previously been given
a draft of the final report containing that material under
section 47
.
The judicial panel member must not produce the final report until after the
applicable response period has ended (or all of the applicable response periods
have ended).
When deciding whether to include particular material in the final report, the
judicial panel member—
must take into account representations made in accordance with this
section, and
may exclude the material if they consider that it would not be in the
public interest to include it.
If the judicial panel member has consulted a person under this section,
this
section
does not require the judicial panel member to give that person a draft
of any revised version of the final report or any material included in it.
If
this section
requires the judicial panel member to give a draft of the final
report to two or more persons, the judicial panel member is not required to
give the same draft to all of those persons.
“Applicable response period”, in relation to a person who is consulted under
this section, means—
the period of 30 days beginning with the day on which the draft or
copy of material is given to the person, or
if the judicial panel member is satisfied that there is good reason to
extend the period, such longer period as the judicial panel member
determines.
The judicial panel member must notify the person of any period extended under paragraph (b) .
In this section —
“material criticising a public authority” means material which, in the judicial panel member’s view, constitutes significant criticism of a public authority (and that material may consist of or include criticism of one or more individuals, whether living or not);
“material criticising an individual” means material which, in the judicial panel member’s view, constitutes significant criticism of a living individual who was involved in the conduct forming part of the Troubles to which the investigation relates;
“
serious physical or mental harm” has the meaning given by
section
34
(3)
.
This section
applies where a judicial panel member has produced a final
report.
Except where the investigation was initiated under
section 39
, the Legacy
Commission must give the final report to the person who requested the
investigation.
The Legacy Commission must publish the final report in such manner as it
considers appropriate.
The duties imposed under
sections 46
to
49
must be complied with as soon
as practicable after the investigation to which the final report relates has been
carried out; but this is subject to
subsection (2)
.
If any of the conduct to which the investigation relates is or has been referred
to a prosecutor under
section 51
, the final report is not to be produced or
published unless and until—
the prosecutor has made a decision not to prosecute P for any relevant
offence, or
if the prosecutor has made a decision to prosecute P for any relevant
offence or offences, the prosecution or prosecutions are no longer
continuing.
For the purposes of subsection (2) —
the circumstances in which a prosecution of P is to be regarded as
continuing include circumstances where the trial which forms part of
the prosecution ends without P being convicted or acquitted or any
other verdict being given and either—
the period for the prosecution to seek a retrial is continuing
(without a retrial having been sought), or
the prosecution have sought a retrial;
the circumstances in which a prosecution of P is to be regarded as not
continuing include—
circumstances where the trial which forms part of the
prosecution ends with P being convicted or acquitted or with
another verdict being given, and
circumstances where the trial ends without P being convicted
or acquitted or any other verdict being given and the period
for the prosecution to seek a retrial ends without a retrial
having been sought.
In this section —
“P” means the person who carried out the conduct referred under
section
51
(“the referred conduct”);
“relevant offence”, in relation to a referral to a prosecutor under
section
51
, means—
a suspected offence notified to the prosecutor under section 51 in connection with the referral, and
any other offence which the referred conduct constitutes.
Paragraph 8 of Schedule 5 makes provision about—
other material that must be included in a final report, and
circumstances in which a new final report must be produced.
This section applies where an investigation under
this Part
has been carried
out.
If the relevant Director of Investigations considers there is evidence that
relevant conduct constitutes an offence under the law of Northern Ireland by
an individual whose identity is known to that Director, the Director—
may refer the conduct to the Director of Public Prosecutions for
Northern Ireland, and
if the conduct is referred, must notify that prosecutor of the offence
concerned.
If the relevant Director of Investigations considers there is evidence that
relevant conduct constitutes an offence under the law of England and Wales
by an individual whose identity is known to that Director, the Director—
may refer the conduct to the Director of Public Prosecutions (for
England and Wales), and
if the conduct is referred, must notify that prosecutor of the offence
concerned.
If the relevant Director of Investigations considers there is evidence that
relevant conduct constitutes an offence under the law of Scotland by an
individual whose identity is known to that Director, the Director may—
refer the conduct to the Lord Advocate, and
notify that prosecutor of the offence concerned.
The Lord Advocate may direct the relevant Director of Investigations to
exercise the power of referral and notification in accordance with
subsection
(4)
; and the Director must comply with any direction that is given.
Before exercising a power of referral and notification to a prosecutor under
any of
subsections (2)
to
(4)
, the relevant Director of Investigations must
request the prosecutor’s advice on whether the prosecutor is likely to decide
to prosecute any person for a relevant offence.
This does not apply to a referral and notification made pursuant to a direction under subsection (5) .
In
subsection (6)
“relevant offence”, in relation to a proposed referral to a
prosecutor, means—
a suspected offence to be notified to the prosecutor in connection with
the proposed referral, and
any other offence which the conduct to be referred constitutes.
In any case where the relevant Director of Investigations refers relevant
conduct to a prosecutor under any of
subsections (2)
to
(4)
, the Director—
must give the prosecutor such information and material relating to
the conduct as the Director considers appropriate, and
must, if requested to do so by the prosecutor—
obtain such information or material relating to the conduct as
it is practicable to obtain, and
give the information or material obtained to the prosecutor.
In this section “relevant conduct” means—
the conduct to which the investigation relates (the “main conduct”),
or
any other conduct that relates to, or is otherwise connected with, the
main conduct;
and for this purpose other conduct is (in particular) to be regarded as connected with the main conduct if all of that conduct formed part of the same event.
The statement must (in particular) set out how a Legacy Commission officer
is to determine whether a matter might reasonably be expected to—
give rise to a conflict of interest in respect of a person’s work in
connection with functions under this Part, or
otherwise affect a person’s ability to carry out that work fairly and
impartially.
The Legacy Commission must keep under review any statement published
under
subsection (1)
, and may from time to time publish a revised statement.
Legacy Commission officers must have regard to any statement published
under
subsection (1)
.
The Chief Executive Officer may require a Legacy Commission officer to
provide information about any matter which might reasonably be expected
to—
give rise to a conflict of interest in respect of the Legacy Commission
officer’s work in connection with functions under this Part, or
otherwise affect the officer’s ability to carry out that work fairly and
impartially.
Where an investigation under
this Part
is (or is to be) allocated to a Director
of Investigations, the Director must provide the Chief Executive Officer with
information about any matter which might reasonably be expected to—
give rise to a conflict of interest in respect of the Director’s work in
connection with the investigation, or
otherwise affect the Director’s ability to carry out that work fairly and
impartially.
Where a Legacy Commission officer is (or is to be) required by a Director of
Investigations to carry out any work in connection with an investigation under
this Part
, the officer must provide the Director with information about any
matter which might reasonably be expected to—
give rise to a conflict of interest in respect of the officer’s work in
connection with the investigation, or
otherwise affect the officer’s ability to carry out that work fairly and
impartially.
If it appears to the relevant Director of Investigations that—
a Legacy Commission officer may have a conflict of interest in relation
to an investigation under
this Part
, or
a matter may otherwise affect the officer’s ability to carry out work
in connection with the investigation fairly and impartially,
the Director must not require or allow the officer to carry out any work (or further work) in connection with the investigation.
For the purposes of this section, a person “may have a relevant
disqualification” in relation to an investigation under
this Part
where—
the person may have a conflict of interest in relation to the
investigation, or
a matter may otherwise affect the person’s ability to carry out work
in connection with the investigation fairly and impartially.
If it appears to the Chief Executive Officer that a Director of Investigations
may have a relevant disqualification in relation to an investigation under
this
Part
, the Chief Executive Officer—
must not allocate the investigation to that Director under section 41 , and
if the investigation is already allocated to that Director, must reallocate
the investigation.
The Chief Executive Officer must allocate an investigation under
this Part
to
a Legacy Commission officer other than a Director of Investigations if—
the investigation may not be allocated to either Director of
Investigations because it appears to the Chief Executive Officer that
both Directors may have a relevant disqualification in relation to the
investigation, or
it appears to the Chief Executive Officer that a Director of
Investigations may have a relevant disqualification in relation to the
investigation and the Chief Executive Officer considers that it is
inappropriate or impractical for the investigation to be allocated to
the other Director of Investigations.
If an investigation is allocated to a Legacy Commission officer under
subsection
(3)
, a reference in this Act to the relevant Director of Investigations or to the
Director to whom the investigation is (or is to be) allocated is to that officer.
Subsections
(6)
and
(7)
apply where a request under
section 34
or
35
for an
investigation is a “subsequent request” by virtue of
section 38
(1)
(b)
(requests
relating to conduct being investigated already).
The Chief Executive Officer must consider whether, if the subsequent request
were accepted, the relevant Director of Investigations mentioned in
section
38
(5)
and
(7)
may have a relevant disqualification in relation to the
investigation.
If it appears to the Chief Executive Officer that the Director may have a
relevant disqualification in relation to the investigation, the Chief Executive
Officer must—
direct the other Director of Investigations to determine how the
subsequent request is to be dealt with, or
direct another Legacy Commission officer to make that determination,
if it appears to the Chief Executive Officer that the other Director may
also have a relevant disqualification in relation to the investigation.
Subsections
(9)
and
(10)
apply where the Directors of Investigations acting
jointly decide to carry out investigations in conjunction with each other by
virtue of
section 43
(13)
(b)
.
The Chief Executive Officer must consider whether either of the Directors
may have a relevant disqualification in relation to any of the investigations.
If it appears to the Chief Executive Officer that either Director may have a
relevant disqualification in relation to any of the investigations, the Chief
Executive Officer must—
direct that the investigations are not to be carried out in conjunction
with each other, or
reallocate the investigations so that they may be carried out in
conjunction with each other by virtue of
section 43
(13)
(a)
.
Where this section requires or permits the reallocation of an investigation,
the duties imposed on the Chief Executive Officer by
section 41
(3)
(consultation
on allocation) and this section apply again.
In this Act “inquisitorial proceedings” means proceedings under this Part, presided over by a judicial panel member, examining all the circumstances of a person’s death.
A judicial panel member presiding over inquisitorial proceedings or producing
a final report (on the findings of proceedings) must not rule on, and has no
power to determine, any person’s civil or criminal liability.
But a judicial panel member should not be inhibited in the discharge of their
functions by any likelihood of liability being inferred from facts that they
determine.
The senior judicial panel member must allocate inquisitorial proceedings in
respect of a death to a judicial panel member where this section applies to
the death.
This section applies to a death caused directly by conduct forming part of
the Troubles if—
the Secretary of State gives a direction to the senior judicial panel
member in relation to the death,
the Advocate General for Northern Ireland gives a direction to the
senior judicial panel member under
section 16AB
of the Coroners Act
(Northern Ireland) 1959 in relation to the death, or
a coroner in Northern Ireland ceases progressing a resumed inquest
into the death for reasons relating to public interest immunity.
The Secretary of State may give a direction under
subsection (2)
(a)
in relation
to a death only if a coroner in Northern Ireland ceased progressing an inquest
into the death for reasons relating to public interest immunity during the
period beginning with 28 February 2019 and ending with 30 April 2024.
A coroner ceases progressing an inquest “for reasons relating to public interest
immunity” if—
evidence or documents are (or are to be) withheld from the inquest
on grounds of public interest immunity, and
the coroner considers that, without the evidence or documents, it is
not possible for a final determination, verdict or findings to be made
or given at the inquest.
A “resumed inquest” is an inquest resumed in accordance with—
section 16AA of the Coroners Act (Northern Ireland) 1959, or
a direction given to the Presiding coroner under
section 16AB
of that
Act.
The senior judicial panel member must comply with
subsection (1)
as soon
as practicable after they determine that this section applies to a death; but
they may postpone allocating inquisitorial proceedings in respect of the death
to a judicial panel member if they consider that—
a person who is eligible to be appointed as a judicial panel member
would preside over the proceedings effectively and efficiently, and
that person is likely to be appointed as a judicial panel member within
a reasonable period.
Inquisitorial proceedings in respect of a death may not be allocated to a
judicial panel member unless this section applies to the death.
Where inquisitorial proceedings in respect of a death are allocated to a judicial
panel member, they must—
ensure that the proceedings are carried out, and
preside over the proceedings.
Subject to any provision of this Act or of regulations under
section 69
, it is
for the relevant judicial panel member to decide how the proceedings should
be carried out, including—
the steps to be taken in preparation for the proceedings, and
the procedure and conduct of the proceedings.
In deciding how the proceedings should be carried out, the relevant judicial
panel member—
must take into account any investigation (of any kind, including an
inquest) of the death that has previously been carried out by any other
person, and
must (in particular) ensure that they not do anything which duplicates
any aspect of any such previous investigation unless, in their view,
the duplication is essential.
The relevant judicial panel member must ensure that, in the carrying out of
the proceedings, regard is had to the context in which the conduct examined
in the course of the proceedings occurred.
If a judicial panel member to whom inquisitorial proceedings are allocated
considers that those proceedings should be carried out in conjunction with
other inquisitorial proceedings which are also allocated to them, the
proceedings may be carried out in conjunction with each other.
If the senior judicial panel member considers that inquisitorial proceedings
allocated to one judicial panel member should be carried out in conjunction
with other inquisitorial proceedings allocated to another judicial panel member,
the senior judicial panel member may re-allocate the proceedings accordingly.
In deciding when inquisitorial proceedings are to be carried out, the relevant
judicial panel member must have regard to the need to ensure that the
proceedings are concluded as soon as practicable.
The relevant judicial panel member may take evidence on oath, and for that
purpose may administer oaths.
The Legacy Commission must ensure that there is a lawyer to act as counsel
to any inquisitorial proceedings (whether by employing or engaging the
services of a lawyer or otherwise).
“Lawyer” means—
a solicitor or barrister in Northern Ireland,
a person who for the purposes of the Legal Services Act 2007 is an
authorised person in relation to an activity which is a reserved legal
activity within the meaning of that Act, or
a solicitor or advocate in Scotland.
For the purposes of this Act, inquisitorial proceedings are “carried out” during
the period—
beginning with the allocation of the proceedings to a judicial panel
member, and
ending with the conclusion of the proceedings.
In this Act “the relevant judicial panel member”, in relation to inquisitorial
proceedings, means the judicial panel member to whom the proceedings are
allocated by the senior judicial panel member.
As regards any inquisitorial proceedings, the relevant judicial panel member
must take reasonable steps to identify—
each close family member of the deceased, or
if there are no such close family members, a family member of the
deceased.
For the meaning of “close family member” of a deceased person, see
section
113
.
The relevant judicial panel member must notify the following about the
inquisitorial proceedings—
each person identified in accordance with subsection (1) (a) , and
the person (if any) identified in accordance with
subsection (1)
(b)
, if
the judicial panel member considers it would be appropriate to notify
them.
The relevant judicial panel member may designate persons as core participants
in the inquisitorial proceedings.
A person may be designated as a core participant only if they apply to be so
designated.
A designation may be varied or revoked.
Where, as regards any inquisitorial proceedings, one or more close family
members of the deceased apply under this section, the relevant judicial panel
member must designate at least one of them.
A person required by the relevant judicial panel member to give evidence to
inquisitorial proceedings may apply to the judicial panel member for
permission to give that evidence through a live audio link or live video link
(and may do so if permission is given).
The judicial panel member must give permission unless they consider that it
is impracticable for the person to give evidence in that manner.
Permission may be given whether the person is in the United Kingdom or
elsewhere.
If the judicial panel member refuses or withdraws permission, they must give
the person reasons for doing so.
In this section—
“
live audio link” means a live telephone link or other arrangement
which—
enables a person (“P”) to hear all other persons attending
inquisitorial proceedings who are not in the same location as
P, and
enables all other persons attending inquisitorial proceedings
who are not in the same location as P to hear P;
“
live video link” means a live television link or other arrangement
which—
enables a person (“P”) to see and hear all other persons
attending inquisitorial proceedings who are not in the same
location as P, and
enables all other persons attending inquisitorial proceedings
who are not in the same location as P to see and hear P.
The extent (if any) to which a person is unable to hear or see by reason of
any impairment of hearing or eyesight is to be disregarded for the purposes
of
subsection (5)
.
Subject to any restrictions imposed by a notice or order under
section 64
, the
relevant judicial panel member must take such steps as they consider
reasonable to secure that members of the public (including reporters) are
able—
to attend the inquisitorial proceedings or to see and hear a
simultaneous transmission of the proceedings;
to obtain or to view a record of evidence and documents given,
produced or provided to the relevant judicial panel member or the
Legacy Commission in connection with the proceedings.
No recording or broadcast of inquisitorial proceedings may be made except—
at the request of the relevant judicial panel member, or
with their permission and in accordance with any terms on which
permission is given.
Any such request or permission must be framed so as not to enable a person
to see or hear by means of a recording or broadcast anything that the person
is prohibited, by a notice or order under
section 64
, from seeing or hearing.
Restrictions may, in accordance with this section , be imposed on—
attendance at inquisitorial proceedings, or at any particular part of
inquisitorial proceedings;
the identification of any witness at inquisitorial proceedings, or at any
particular part of inquisitorial proceedings;
disclosure or publication of any evidence or documents given,
produced or provided to a judicial panel member or the Legacy
Commission in connection with inquisitorial proceedings.
Restrictions may be imposed in either or both of the following ways—
by being specified in a notice (in this Part, a “restriction notice”) given
by the Secretary of State to the relevant judicial panel member at any
time before the final report (on the findings of the proceedings) is
published;
by being specified in an order (in this Part, a “restriction order”) made
by the relevant judicial panel member at any such time.
A restriction notice or restriction order may specify only such restrictions—
as are required by any legislation (including any assimilated
enforceable obligation) or rule of law, or
as the Secretary of State or relevant judicial panel member considers
to be—
conducive to the proceedings fulfilling their purpose, or
necessary in the public interest,
having regard (in particular) to the matters mentioned in
subsection
(4)
.
Those matters are—
the extent to which any restriction on attendance, disclosure or
publication might inhibit the allaying of public concern;
any risk of harm or damage that could be avoided or reduced by any
such restriction;
the extent to which not imposing any particular restriction would be
likely to be detrimental to the welfare of any witness;
any conditions as to confidentiality subject to which a person acquired
information that they are to give, or have given, to the proceedings;
the extent to which not imposing any particular restriction would be
likely—
to cause delay or to impair the efficiency or effectiveness of
the proceedings, or
otherwise to result in additional cost (whether to public funds
or to witnesses or others).
In subsection (4) (b) “harm or damage” includes—
death or physical or mental harm;
damage to the national security interests of the United Kingdom or
to international relations.
In this section—
“
assimilated enforceable obligation” means an obligation (as modified
from time to time) which forms part of assimilated law by virtue of
section 3 of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018;
“
witness”, in relation to inquisitorial proceedings, means an individual
who gives evidence to, or otherwise participates in, the proceedings.
Restrictions specified in a restriction notice given, or a restriction order made,
in connection with any inquisitorial proceedings have effect in addition to
restrictions specified in any earlier restriction notice given, or restriction order
made, in connection with those proceedings.
The Secretary of State may vary or revoke a restriction notice by giving a
further notice to the relevant judicial panel member at any time before the
final report (on the findings of the proceedings) is published.
The relevant judicial panel member may vary or revoke a restriction order
by making a further order at any time before the final report is published.
A restriction within
section 64
(1)
(b)
or
(c)
that is imposed by a restriction
notice or order (a “disclosure restriction”) continues in force indefinitely,
unless—
under the terms of the restriction notice or order the restriction expires
(whether when the final report is published or at some other time),
or
the restriction notice or order is varied or revoked under this section.
This is subject to subsection (5) .
After the final report is published, a disclosure restriction does not apply to
a public authority (within the meaning of the
Freedom of Information Act
2000
), or a Scottish public authority (within the meaning of the
Freedom of
Information (Scotland) Act 2002
), in relation to information held by the
authority otherwise than as a result of the contravention of any disclosure
restriction.
After the final report is published, the Secretary of State may, by notice
published in such way as the Secretary of State considers appropriate—
revoke a restriction order or restriction notice containing a disclosure
restriction that is still in force, or
vary it so as to remove or relax any such restriction.
This section applies where an application is made for a restriction order that—
contains a disclosure restriction, or
varies a restriction order (“the initial order”) so as to—
add a disclosure restriction, or
extend the period for which a disclosure restriction in the initial
order applies.
In this section “disclosure restriction” means a restriction within section 64 (1) (b) or (c) .
For the application period, a restriction order containing—
in a case within
subsection (1)
(a)
, the disclosure restriction mentioned
there, or
in a case within subsection (1) (b) , the variation mentioned there,
is treated as made.
But in that period, the relevant judicial panel member may disclose the identity
of the witness or (as the case may be) the evidence or documents, to a person
to whom the disclosure could not otherwise be made if—
the judicial panel member considers that disclosure to the person is
necessary for the determination of the application, and
the judicial panel member has given the following an opportunity to
make representations about whether disclosure to that person should
be made—
the witness or (as the case may be) the person giving,
producing or providing the evidence or documents to the
inquisitorial proceedings;
the person making the application.
In subsection (2) “the application period” means the period—
beginning with the making of the application, and
ending with the determination or withdrawal of the application.
In
subsection (3)
a reference to the witness, evidence or documents is to the
witness, evidence or documents that are the subject of the disclosure restriction
in question.
Where a person contravenes a restriction notice or restriction order or threatens
to do so, the Secretary of State or the Legacy Commission may certify the
matter to the High Court in Northern Ireland.
The court, after hearing any evidence or representations on a matter certified
to it under
subsection (1)
, may make such order by way of enforcement or
otherwise as it could make if the matter had arisen in proceedings before the
court.
The relevant judicial panel member may award reasonable amounts to a
person—
in respect of legal representation in relation to the inquisitorial
proceedings,
by way of compensation for loss of time in attending the proceedings,
or
in respect of expenses properly incurred, or to be incurred, in
attending, or otherwise in relation to, the proceedings.
A person is eligible for an award under
this section
in relation to any
inquisitorial proceedings only if—
they are a core participant in the proceedings (see section 61 ),
they are attending the proceedings to give evidence or to produce any
document or other thing, or
they are a person who, in the opinion of the relevant judicial panel
member, has a particular interest in the proceedings that justifies such
an award.
The relevant judicial panel member may make an award to a person under
this section
only if they consider that it is in the public interest to do so,
taking into account (in particular)—
the person’s financial resources,
whether the award is needed to enable the person to give evidence
or otherwise participate in the proceedings effectively, and
the need to conduct the proceedings efficiently and without
unnecessary cost.
Where—
the relevant judicial panel member is determining whether an award
under this section should be made in respect of a person’s legal
representation other than joint representation, and
the judicial panel member considers that the person could have been
(or could be) jointly represented instead,
the judicial panel member must take that into account when determining whether the award should be made and the amount of any award.
The power to make an award under this section is subject to—
any conditions imposed by the Legacy Commission and notified by
it to the relevant judicial panel member, and
regulations made by the Secretary of State under subsection (7) .
The kinds of conditions that may be imposed by the Legacy Commission on
the making of an award under
this section
include conditions—
as to the matters or things in respect of which an award may or may
not be made, and
relating to the determination of whether—
expenses (including for legal representation) have been properly
incurred, or
costs are necessary.
The Secretary of State may by regulations make provision about awards under this section , including provision—
about applying for an award,
about determining the amount of an award,
imposing conditions on the making of an award, including the kinds
of conditions described in
subsection (6)
(a)
to
(c)
, and
for a judicial panel member to exercise a discretion, including in
relation to the matters described in
paragraphs (a)
to
(c)
.
Before making regulations under
subsection (7)
, the Secretary of State must
consult the Legacy Commission.
Regulations under subsection (7) —
are subject to negative procedure, and
may make different provision for different areas.
For the purposes of Article 3 of the Perjury (Northern Ireland) Order 1979 (S.I. 1979/1714 (N.I. 19))—
inquisitorial proceedings are to be treated as a judicial proceeding in
Northern Ireland even if held elsewhere;
a statement made on oath and given in evidence to inquisitorial
proceedings through a live audio link or live video link is to be treated
as having been made in the proceedings.
The Secretary of State may by regulations make provision about procedure
and evidence in relation to inquisitorial proceedings.
Before making regulations under this section, the Secretary of State must
consult the Legacy Commission.
Regulations under this section are subject to negative procedure.
This section applies where inquisitorial proceedings are being, or have been,
carried out.
If the relevant judicial panel member considers there is evidence that relevant
conduct constitutes an offence under the law of Northern Ireland by an
individual whose identity is known to that judicial panel member, they—
may refer the conduct to the Director of Public Prosecutions for
Northern Ireland, and
if the conduct is referred, must notify that prosecutor of the offence
concerned.
If the relevant judicial panel member considers there is evidence that relevant
conduct constitutes an offence under the law of England and Wales by an
individual whose identity is known to that judicial panel member, they—
may refer the conduct to the Director of Public Prosecutions (for
England and Wales), and
if the conduct is referred, must notify that prosecutor of the offence
concerned.
If the relevant judicial panel member considers there is evidence that relevant
conduct constitutes an offence under the law of Scotland by an individual
whose identity is known to that judicial panel member, they may—
refer the conduct to the Lord Advocate, and
notify that prosecutor of the offence concerned.
The Lord Advocate may direct the relevant judicial panel member to exercise
the power of referral and notification in accordance with
subsection (4)
; and
that judicial panel member must comply with any such direction.
In any case where the relevant judicial panel member refers relevant conduct
to a prosecutor under
this section
, that judicial panel member—
must give the prosecutor such information and material relating to
the conduct as they consider appropriate, and
must, if requested to do so by the prosecutor—
obtain such information or material relating to the conduct as
it is practicable to obtain, and
give the information or material obtained to the prosecutor.
If the prosecutor makes such a request, that judicial panel member must not
require or allow a Legacy Commission officer to assist (or further assist) them
to comply with the request if it appears to them that—
the officer may have a conflict of interest in relation to the referral of
relevant conduct, or
a matter may otherwise affect the officer’s ability to carry out work
in connection with the referral fairly and impartially.
For that purpose—
that judicial panel member may require a Legacy Commission officer
to provide information about any matter which might reasonably be
expected to give rise to such a conflict of interest or otherwise affect
the officer’s ability to carry out that work fairly and impartially, and
where a Legacy Commission officer is (or is to be) required or allowed
to assist that judicial panel member to comply with the request, the
officer must provide that judicial panel member with information
about any such matter.
In this section “relevant conduct” means—
the conduct which caused the death to which the inquisitorial
proceedings relate (the “main conduct”), or
any other conduct that relates to, or is otherwise connected with, the
main conduct;
and for this purpose other conduct is (in particular) to be regarded as connected with the main conduct if all of that conduct formed part of the same event.
This section applies where inquisitorial proceedings have been carried out.
The relevant judicial panel member must produce a final report on the findings
of the proceedings.
The final report must be as comprehensive as possible, having regard to—
the need for the report to be accessible to the public,
any restrictions imposed under
section 64
on disclosure or publication
of evidence or documents, and
the duties imposed by sections 12 (1) and 20 (2) .
The final report must include a statement of the manner in which the
proceedings were carried out.
In this Part “final report” means a report under this section.
This section applies where
section 71
requires a judicial panel member to
produce a final report.
Before producing the final report, or giving a draft of the report or other
material to any person under
section 73
, the judicial panel member must give
a draft of the report to—
the Secretary of State, and
any relevant authority that—
made prejudicial information or sensitive information available
under
section 16
in connection with the inquisitorial
proceedings, or
identified information as prejudicial information or sensitive
information under
paragraph 2
or
3
of
Schedule 4
in connection
with the proceedings.
The judicial panel member must during the applicable response period—
allow the Secretary of State to make representations about whether
the publication of the final report by the Legacy Commission would
cause the Commission to contravene—
any restriction imposed under section 64 , or
a duty imposed on the Commission under section 12 (1) or 20 (2) , and
allow any relevant authority which is given a draft of the report under
this section to make representations of a kind mentioned in
paragraph
(a)
(ii)
.
“Applicable response period”, in relation to a person who is given a draft of
the report under this section, means—
the period of 60 days beginning with the day on which the draft is
given to the person, or
if the Secretary of State is satisfied that there is good reason to extend
the period, such longer period as the Secretary of State determines
and notifies to the judicial panel member before the end of the period
of 60 days.
The judicial panel member must notify the person of any period extended under paragraph (b) .
The judicial panel member must not produce the final report, or give a draft
of the report or other material to any person under
section 73
, until after the
applicable response period has ended (or all of the applicable response periods
have ended).
If representations are made in accordance with this section, the judicial panel
member must—
in producing the final report, or preparing a draft of the report or
other material to be given to a person under
section 73
, take the
representations into account, and
before giving a draft of the report or other material to any person
under
section 73
, notify the person who made the representations
about how the representations have been taken into account.
This section applies where—
section 71
requires a judicial panel member to produce a final report,
and
the judicial panel member has complied with all applicable duties
imposed under
section 72
.
Before producing the final report, the judicial panel member must—
give a draft of the report to each core participant (if any), and
allow each core participant to make representations about the report
during the applicable response period.
The judicial panel member is not required to give a draft of the report to a
person under
subsection (2)
(a)
if that person has informed the judicial panel
member that they do not wish to receive it.
If it is proposed to include in the final report material criticising an individual,
the judicial panel member must, before producing the report—
give a copy of that material to the individual, and
allow the individual to make representations about that material during
the applicable response period.
If it is proposed to include in the final report material criticising a public
authority, the judicial panel member must, before producing the report—
give a copy of that material to the public authority or to a person who,
in the judicial panel member’s view, currently has responsibility for
the public authority, and
allow that public authority or person to make representations about
that material during the applicable response period.
Subsection (5)
applies even if the public authority has previously been given
a draft of the final report containing that material under
section 72
.
The judicial panel member must not produce the final report until after the
applicable response period has ended (or all of the applicable response periods
have ended).
When deciding whether to include particular material in the final report, the
judicial panel member—
must take into account representations made in accordance with this
section, and
may exclude the material if they consider that it would not be in the
public interest to include it.
If the judicial panel member has consulted a person under this section,
this
section
does not require the judicial panel member to give that person a draft
of any revised version of the final report or any material included in it.
If
this section
requires the judicial panel member to give a draft of the final
report to two or more persons, the judicial panel member is not required to
give the same draft to all of those persons.
“Applicable response period”, in relation to a person who is consulted under
this section, means—
the period of 30 days beginning with the day on which the draft or
copy of material is given to the person, or
if the judicial panel member is satisfied that there is good reason to
extend the period, such longer period as the judicial panel member
determines.
The judicial panel member must notify the person of any period extended under paragraph (b) .
In this section —
“material criticising a public authority” means material which, in the judicial panel member’s view, constitutes significant criticism of a public authority (and that material may consist of or include criticism of one or more individuals, whether living or not);
“material criticising an individual” means material which, in the judicial panel member’s view, constitutes significant criticism of a living individual who was involved in the conduct examined in the course of the inquisitorial proceedings.
This section
applies where a judicial panel member has produced a final
report.
The Legacy Commission must publish the final report in such manner as it
considers appropriate.
The duties under sections
71
to
74
must be complied with as soon as
practicable after the inquisitorial proceedings have been carried out; but this
is subject to
subsection (2)
.
If any of the conduct examined in the course of the inquisitorial proceedings
is or has been referred to a prosecutor under
section 70
, the final report is
not to be produced or published unless and until—
the prosecutor has made a decision not to prosecute P for any relevant
offence, or
if the prosecutor has made a decision to prosecute P for any relevant
offence or offences, the prosecution or prosecutions are no longer
continuing.
For the purposes of subsection (2) —
“P” means the person who carried out the conduct referred under section 70 (“the referred conduct”);
“relevant offence”, in relation to a referral to a prosecutor under
section
70
, means—
a suspected offence notified to the prosecutor under section 70 in connection with the referral, or
any other offence which the referred conduct constitutes;
section 50
(3)
(whether prosecution is regarded as continuing) applies
as it applies for the purposes of
section 50
(2)
.
This section applies where the Legacy Commission publishes a final report
on the findings of inquisitorial proceedings.
The relevant judicial panel member must, as soon as practicable, send to a
registrar of deaths a certificate including all particulars concerning the relevant
death which—
are known to the judicial panel member by virtue of any of their
functions under this Part, and
a coroner would be required to include in a certificate under
section
23
of the
Coroners Act (Northern Ireland) 1959
.
The certificate under this section is to be treated by the registrar as a coroner’s
certificate under that section.
Where the registrar is required by legislation to register information about,
or refer in a register to, a coroner or an inquest, the registrar must register
information about, or refer to, the judicial panel member or (as appropriate)
the proceedings.
In this section—
“
registrar of deaths” means any person holding an appointment under
Article 6
(1)
of the
Births and Deaths Registration (Northern Ireland)
Order 1976
(S.I. 1976/1041 (N.I. 14));
“
relevant death” means the death to which the inquisitorial proceedings
mentioned in
subsection (1)
related.
An application to a court for a judicial review of a decision made in relation
to any particular inquisitorial proceedings may not be brought after the end
of the relevant period, unless that time limit is extended by the court.
“The relevant period” is the period of 14 days after the day on which the
applicant becomes aware of the decision.
Subsection (1) does not apply where an earlier time limit applies.
In subsection
(1)
, the reference to a decision made in relation to any particular
inquisitorial proceedings includes a decision made in relation to the final
report on the findings of the proceedings.
But subsection
(1)
does not apply to an application made after the publication
of the final report, if the application is for a judicial review of—
a decision as to the contents of the final report, or
a decision of which the applicant could not have become aware until
the publication of that report.
In section 56 of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 (exclusion of matters from
legal proceedings etc)—
in subsection (1) for “or Inquiries Act proceedings” substitute “,
Inquiries Act proceedings or inquisitorial proceedings”;
in subsection (5) after the definition of “Inquiries Act proceedings”
““
insert—
inquisitorial proceedings” has the meaning given by
section 56
of the Northern Ireland Troubles Act 2026;”.
“Inquisitorial proceedings under the Northern Ireland Troubles Act 2026
27
(1)
Nothing in section 56(1) prohibits—
(a)
a disclosure to a judicial panel member to whom inquisitorial
proceedings have been allocated, or(b)
a disclosure to a legal adviser to any inquisitorial
proceedings,where the judicial panel member has ordered the disclosure to be made to them alone or (as the case may be) to them and any legal adviser to the proceedings.
(2)
An order for disclosure under sub-paragraph (1) may be made only
if the judicial panel member considers that the exceptional circumstances of the case make the disclosure essential to enable them to examine all the circumstances of the death to which the proceedings relate.(3)
In this paragraph, a reference to a “legal adviser” to any inquisitorial
proceedings is to—(a)
a person acting as counsel to the proceedings, or
(b)
a Legacy Commission officer or Legacy Commission
contractor who—(i)
is a lawyer (within the meaning given by section
59 (10) of the Northern Ireland Troubles Act 2026),
and(ii)
is providing legal advice or assistance, in connection
with the proceedings, to a person acting as counsel to the proceedings or the judicial panel member to whom the proceedings have been allocated.(4)
In this paragraph “inquisitorial proceedings”, “judicial panel
member”, “Legacy Commission contractor” and “Legacy Commission officer” have the same meaning as in the Northern Ireland Troubles Act 2026.28
(1)
Section 56(1) does not apply in relation to so much of any
inquisitorial proceedings as are restricted proceedings.(2)
Inquisitorial proceedings are “restricted proceedings” for the
purposes of this paragraph if restrictions imposed under section 64 of the Northern Ireland Troubles Act 2026 are in force prohibiting attendance at the proceedings by any person who is not—(a)
the judicial panel member to whom the proceedings have
been allocated,(b)
a legal adviser to the proceedings,
(c)
a person who is a relevant party to the proceedings,
(d)
a person representing such a person for the purposes of the
proceedings, or(e)
a Legacy Commission officer or Legacy Commission
contractor performing functions necessary for the proper functioning of the proceedings.(3)
But sub-paragraph (1) does not permit any disclosure which has
not been made in accordance with paragraph 27 (1) .(4)
In this paragraph “relevant party”, in relation to any inquisitorial
proceedings, means—(a)
any person who, in accordance with paragraph 27 (1) , is
making a disclosure within paragraph 27 (1) (a) or (b) ;(b)
any person giving evidence to the proceedings in
circumstances where, in the absence of sub-paragraph (1) , the prohibition imposed by section 56(1) would be breached;(c)
any person whose conduct is the interception-related conduct
(within the meaning of section 56) to which the disclosure or evidence relates (whether or not that conduct has in fact occurred);(d)
any other person to whom the subject-matter of the
disclosure or evidence has been lawfully disclosed in accordance with section 58.(5)
Paragraph 27 (3) and (4) (definitions) apply for the purposes of this
paragraph.”
This section applies where—
an investigation under Part 3 is being carried out, or
inquisitorial proceedings are being carried out.
The appropriate judicial panel member must give each eligible person an
opportunity to provide, to the Legacy Commission, a statement (a “personal
statement”) about the way in which, and degree to which, the matters
mentioned in
subsection (3)
have affected, and continue to affect—
the eligible person, and
any other persons (so far as the eligible person is aware of, and wishes
the statement to deal with, the effect on those persons).
The matters are—
in the case of an investigation under
Part 3
, the conduct to which the
investigation relates (“relevant conduct”), any death or serious physical
or mental harm caused by the relevant conduct and the event during
which the relevant conduct occurred;
in the case of inquisitorial proceedings, the death to which the
proceedings relate, the conduct that caused the death and the event
during which that conduct occurred.
If an eligible person provides a personal statement, the appropriate judicial
panel member must give the eligible person an opportunity to supplement
the statement.
“Eligible person”, in the case of an investigation under Part 3 , means—
if a person’s death was caused by relevant conduct—
each known close family member of the deceased, or
if there are no known close family members, any known family
member of the deceased to whom the judicial panel member
considers it appropriate to give an opportunity to provide a
personal statement;
if a person (“the injured person”) was caused to suffer serious physical
or mental harm by relevant conduct—
the injured person, or
if the injured person has subsequently died, each known close
family member of the injured person or, if there are no known
close family members, any known family member of the injured
person to whom the judicial panel member considers it
appropriate to give an opportunity to provide a personal
statement.
“Eligible person”, in the case of inquisitorial proceedings, means—
each known close family member of the deceased, or
if there are no known close family members, any known family
member of the deceased to whom the judicial panel member considers
it appropriate to give an opportunity to provide a personal statement.
For the purposes of this section —
“the appropriate judicial panel member” means the judicial panel
member appointed under
section 46
or (as the case may be) to whom
the inquisitorial proceedings are allocated;
a person is “known” if they are known to the Legacy Commission or
appropriate judicial panel member by virtue of any function under
this Act;
section 34 (3) (meaning of “serious physical or mental harm”) applies.
For the meaning of “close family member” of the deceased, see section 113 .
This section applies where an eligible person—
provides a personal statement in accordance with section 79 , and
notifies the Legacy Commission that they wish the personal statement
to be published by the Commission.
The Legacy Commission must publish the personal statement.
But that duty does not apply if publication of the personal statement—
would contravene section 12 (1) or 20 (2) ,
would contravene any restriction imposed under section 64 , or
would, in the appropriate judicial panel member’s view, be contrary
to the public interest.
In such a case, the appropriate judicial panel member must, if it is possible
to do so, produce an edited version of the personal statement the publication
of which would not—
contravene section 12 (1) or 20 (2) ,
contravene any restriction imposed under section 64 , or
be, in the appropriate judicial panel member’s view, contrary to the
public interest.
Where—
the appropriate judicial panel member produces an edited version of
a personal statement in accordance with
subsection (4)
, and
the person who provided the personal statement agrees to the
publication of that version,
the Legacy Commission must publish that version.
The duties under
subsections (2)
,
(4)
and
(5)
do not apply if, and for as long
as,
section 50
(2)
or
75
(2)
has the effect of suspending the duty to publish any
final report on the findings of the investigation or inquisitorial proceedings
in question.
If the Legacy Commission—
intends to publish an edited version of the personal statement in
accordance with
subsection (5)
, or
intends to publish neither—
the personal statement because subsection (3) applies, nor
any edited version of the personal statement because it is not
possible to do so in accordance with
subsection (4)
,
it must give the person who provided the personal statement reasons for its decision.
In this section —
“the appropriate judicial panel member” has the meaning given by section 79 (7) (a) ;
a reference to a personal statement includes anything which
supplements a personal statement;
a reference to an edited version of a personal statement includes a
version of the statement which has been redacted.
This section applies where an investigation under
Part 3
or inquisitorial
proceedings are being carried out.
The relevant Director of Investigations or (as the case may be) relevant judicial
panel member must, in exercising their functions in relation to the investigation
or proceedings, have regard to the welfare of any individual who gives
evidence to, or otherwise participates in, the investigation or proceedings.
This section applies where—
for the purposes of an investigation under
Part 3
or inquisitorial
proceedings, a relevant person decides to contact a person (“P”) in
connection with P’s conduct as a member of the armed forces which
is conduct forming part of the Troubles, and
a relevant person has not previously contacted P for the purposes of
the investigation or proceedings.
This section does not apply if the relevant person decides to contact P because
they suspect that P may have committed an offence.
The relevant Director of Investigations or (as the case may be) relevant judicial
panel member must notify the Secretary of State of—
the decision to contact P,
the conduct forming part of the Troubles to which the investigation
relates or the death to which the proceedings relate, and
P’s contact details (so far as known).
The Secretary of State must, as soon as practicable after being notified under
subsection (3)
, take all reasonable steps to make P aware of the relevant
person’s decision to contact them.
If the Secretary of State makes P aware of the decision, the Secretary of State
must notify the relevant Director of Investigations or relevant judicial panel
member of that fact.
A relevant person may not contact P for the purposes of the investigation or
proceedings until whichever of the following occurs first—
the relevant Director of Investigations or relevant judicial panel member
being notified under
subsection (5)
that P is aware of the decision, or
the end of the period of 14 days beginning with the day on which the
Secretary of State is notified under
subsection (3)
of the decision.
In this section—
“
contacting a person” includes—
imposing a requirement on the person under section 17 , or
otherwise requiring the person to provide information or
produce a document or other thing;
“
relevant person”—
in relation to an investigation under
Part 3
, means the relevant
Director of Investigations or another Legacy Commission officer;
in relation to inquisitorial proceedings, mean the relevant
judicial panel member or a Legacy Commission officer.
The Secretary of State may by regulations make provision corresponding or
similar to—
section 82 , or
section 16AE
of the Coroners Act (Northern Ireland) 1959 (which is
inserted by
section 100
),
in relation to decisions to contact a person in connection with their conduct as a member of a police force which is conduct forming part of the Troubles.
Regulations under this section are subject to negative procedure.
The Legacy Commission must publish a statement setting out how the
following functions are to be exercised—
any power of referral and notification to a prosecutor under
section
51
,
the duty under that section to request a prosecutor’s advice before
exercising such a power, and
any power of referral and notification to a prosecutor under
section
70
.
The Legacy Commission must keep under review any statement published
under
subsection (1)
, and may from time to time publish a revised statement.
A Director of Investigations or judicial panel member must, when exercising
a function to which any statement published under
subsection (1)
relates,
have regard to the statement.
A duty to comply with a direction given by the Lord Advocate under
section
51
(5)
or
70
(5)
is not subject to this section or any statement published under
subsection (1)
.
This section
applies where an investigation under
Part 3
or inquisitorial
proceedings are being, or have been, carried out.
If the relevant Director of Investigations or (as the case may be) relevant
judicial panel member considers there is evidence that a member of the PSNI
may have committed a relevant offence, they must refer the matter to the
Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland (“the Ombudsman”).
A “relevant offence” is any Troubles-related offence other than—
murder, manslaughter or culpable homicide,
any other offence committed by causing the death of a person,
an offence committed by causing a person to suffer serious physical
or mental harm (within the meaning given by
section 34
(3)
), or
an offence which is not itself within
paragraph (a)
,
(b)
or
(c)
but which
is related to, or is otherwise connected with, an offence within any of
those paragraphs (whether the offences were committed by the same
person or different persons).
For this purpose, one offence is to be regarded as connected with another offence (in particular) if both offences formed part of the same event.
For the purposes of this section an offence is “Troubles-related” if—
it is an offence under the law of Northern Ireland, England and Wales
or Scotland, and
the conduct which constitutes the offence was to any extent conduct
forming part of the Troubles.
Subsection (6) applies if—
the Ombudsman sends a report to the Director of Public Prosecutions
for Northern Ireland under
section 58
(2)
of the
Police (Northern
Ireland) Act 1998
in connection with a referral under
this section
, and
the Ombudsman is requested under
section 58
(3)
of
that Act
to provide
further information in connection with the report and notifies the
Legacy Commission of that request.
If the Legacy Commission holds any of the requested information and may
(under another provision of this Act) disclose that information to the
Ombudsman, it must do so.
Part 7
of the
Police (Northern Ireland) Act 1998
(police complaints and
disciplinary proceedings) is amended as follows.
In section 50A (complaints relating to conduct forming part of the Troubles)—
“(5A)
This section does not prevent the Ombudsman from—
(a)
carrying out a formal investigation in connection with
a referral to the Ombudsman under section 85 of the Northern Ireland Troubles Act 2026, or(b)
carrying out a criminal investigation for the purposes
of a prosecution, other than a private prosecution, in connection with such a referral.”;
in subsection (6)—
in the definition of “conduct forming part of the Troubles”, for
“has the same meaning” substitute “and “Troubles-related
offence” have the same meaning”;
in the definition of “formal investigation”, omit from “(whether”
to the end.
In
section 55
(consideration by the Ombudsman of matters other than
complaints)—
in subsection (5), after “or (4A),” insert “or
section 85
of the Northern
Ireland Troubles Act 2026,”;
“(c)
the Legacy Commission, in the case of a matter referred
under section 85 of the Northern Ireland Troubles Act 2026,”.
In section 59 (disciplinary proceedings after investigation)—
in subsection (1), after “section 57(8)” insert “, other than a
Troubles-related report,”;
“(1ZA)
Subsection (1B) also applies if—
(a)
the Director decides to initiate criminal proceedings in
relation to the subject matter of a Troubles-related report sent to the Director under section 58(2), and(b)
a member of the police force is convicted in those
proceedings.(1ZB)
A “Troubles-related report” is a report under section 56(6) in
connection with a matter referred to the Ombudsman under section 85 of the Northern Ireland Troubles Act 2026.”
In section 62 (statements by Ombudsman about exercise of functions)—
the existing text becomes subsection (1) ;
“(2)
If the Ombudsman proposes to publish such a statement in
relation to a matter referred under section 85 of the Northern Ireland Troubles Act 2026, the Ombudsman—(a)
must not publish the statement until after the final
report is published, and(b)
must not duplicate the content of that report, except to
the extent necessary to explain the Ombudsman’s actions, decisions or determinations.(3)
“(5)
Subsection (1) does not permit the disclosure of sensitive information
except to—(a)
a person to whom subsection (1) applies;
(b)
the Director;
(c)
the Director of Public Prosecutions (for England and Wales);
(d)
the Lord Advocate;
(e)
a coroner in Northern Ireland or England and Wales who is—
(i)
a judge of the High Court in Northern Ireland,
(ii)
a judge of the High Court in England and Wales,
(iii)
a county court judge in Northern Ireland, or
(iv)
a Circuit judge in England and Wales;
(f)
a sheriff in Scotland, if the disclosure is made in respect of an
inquiry into a death being, or to be, held under the Inquiries
into Fatal Accidents and Sudden Deaths etc. (Scotland) Act 2016 (asp 2).(6)
For the purposes of subsection (5) —
(a)
information is “sensitive information” if it was received by a
person to whom subsection (1) applies under paragraph 4 of Schedule 5 to the Northern Ireland Troubles Act 2026, by virtue of sub-paragraph (2) (i) of that paragraph, and(b)
information ceases to be sensitive information if the Legacy
Commission notifies a person to whom subsection (1) applies that the information is no longer sensitive information for the purposes of that Act.”
In
section 64
(Department of Justice regulations), in
subsection (2A)
(b)
, after
“or (4A)” insert “, or
section 85
of the Northern Ireland Troubles Act 2026,”.
This section applies for the purposes of the law of defamation.
The publication—
under this Act of a final report or a draft of a final report,
of any other statement for the purposes of any investigation under Part 3 , or
of any other statement in, or otherwise for the purposes of, any
inquisitorial proceedings,
is absolutely privileged.
The publication of a fair and accurate report of, or copy of or extract from,
a final report is privileged unless the publication is shown to be made with
malice.
Subsection (3)
is not to be read as limiting any privilege subsisting apart from
that subsection.
Inquisitorial proceedings in public are to be treated as proceedings in public
before a court to which—
section 14 of the Defamation Act 1996 , and
section 9
of the
Defamation and Malicious Publication (Scotland) Act
2021
(asp 10),
apply (accordingly, a fair and accurate report of those proceedings is absolutely privileged).
In this section—
“
final report” means a final report produced under
section 46
or
71
;
“
publication” has the meaning it has for the purposes of the law of
defamation generally.
In this Part—
“
the ICIR” means the Independent Commission on Information Retrieval
established by an agreement made between His Majesty’s Government
in the United Kingdom and the Government of Ireland done at Belfast
on 15 October 2015, and
“
the ICIR agreement” means that agreement (as amended from time to
time).
The principal functions of the ICIR are—
to receive and retain information about deaths within its remit (see section 89 ), and
The ICIR has the legal capacities of a body corporate.
The ICIR has the functions conferred on it by this Part and any additional
functions conferred on it by the ICIR agreement; and it must exercise those
functions in accordance with this Part and that agreement.
The ICIR must not do anything which—
would risk prejudicing, or would prejudice, the national security
interests of the United Kingdom or Ireland,
would risk putting, or would put, the life or safety of any person at
risk, or
would risk having, or would have, a prejudicial effect on any actual
or prospective legal proceedings in any part of the United Kingdom
or Ireland.
For the purposes of subsection (5) (c) —
“legal proceedings” means any criminal or civil proceedings, including
proceedings before a coroner or an inquiry under the
Inquiries into
Fatal Accidents and Sudden Deaths etc. (Scotland) Act 2016
(asp 2),
and
legal proceedings are “prospective” at any time if, in the view of the
ICIR, the proceedings are likely to be brought within a reasonable
period after that time.
The Secretary of State may make payments or provide other resources to, or
in respect of, the ICIR in connection with the exercise of the ICIR’s functions.
A person’s death is within the remit of the ICIR if the death was caused
directly by conduct forming part of the Troubles.
It is a function of the ICIR to receive and retain information about deaths
within its remit.
The ICIR must not disclose the name or identity of any individual from whom
the ICIR has received information about a death within its remit.
Where the ICIR has received information about a death within its remit, it
must not disclose the name or identity of any individual who is identified
by that information as being responsible for any of the conduct which caused
the death.
The provision of information by a person to the ICIR does not give the person
immunity from prosecution for any criminal offence.
Information provided to the ICIR about a death within its remit and any
evidence obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the information being
provided to the ICIR—
is not admissible in legal proceedings (which has the meaning given
in
section 88
(6)
), and
may not be used by the Legacy Commission in connection with an
investigation under
Part 3
or inquisitorial proceedings.
Subsection (6) does not affect the admissibility or use of—
information which is held by a person other than the ICIR, unless that
information has been obtained directly or indirectly from the ICIR, or
evidence obtained otherwise than as described in that subsection, even
if the evidence has also been obtained as described in that subsection.
Where a person’s death is within the remit of the ICIR, a family member of
the deceased may make a request to the ICIR for information about the death.
The ICIR must keep a person who makes a request under
this section
informed
about the progress of the request.
A request under
this section
may not be made after the end of the request
period.
The “request period” is the period of two years beginning with the day on
which
this section
comes into force for all purposes.
The Secretary of State may by regulations amend
subsection (4)
so as to
increase the length of the period for the time being specified in that provision.
Regulations under subsection (5) are subject to affirmative procedure.
This section applies where a person makes a request under section 90 .
The ICIR must reject the request if—
the ICIR considers that an investigation (by a person other than the
ICIR) of the death to which the request relates is necessary for the
purposes of ECHR compatibility, or
an investigation under
Part 3
of the conduct which caused that death
is being carried out as a criminal investigation.
For the purposes of subsection (2) (a) —
an investigation is “necessary for the purposes of ECHR compatibility”
where the United Kingdom would contravene Article 2 or 3 of the
Convention (within the meaning of the
Human Rights Act 1998
) if the
investigation were not carried out, and
“investigation”, in relation to a death, includes an inquest (or, in
Scotland, an inquiry) into that death.
For the purposes of
subsection (2)
(b)
, an investigation under
Part 3
is “carried
out as a criminal investigation” unless and until the relevant Director of
Investigations decides that it is not to be carried out as a criminal investigation
(see
section 43
(2)
and
(3)
).
Subject to subsection (2) , the ICIR—
must accept the request if it is made by a person who is a close family
member of the deceased (see
section 113
) and meets the residency
qualification;
may accept the request if—
it is made by a person who is a close family member of the
deceased but does not meet the residency qualification, and
the ICIR is satisfied that it is nevertheless appropriate to accept
the request;
must reject the request if it is made by a family member of the
deceased other than a close family member, unless the ICIR is
satisfied—
that no close family member of the deceased objects to the
request, and
that it is appropriate to accept the request,
(in which case the ICIR may accept the request).
When determining for the purposes of
subsection (5)
(c)
whether it is
“appropriate” to accept the request, the ICIR must have regard (in particular)—
to the family relationship between the person making the request and
the deceased, and
to whether the person making the request meets the residency
qualification.
The person making the request meets the “residency qualification” if the
person—
was resident in the United Kingdom or Ireland at the time of the
deceased’s death, or
is resident in the United Kingdom or Ireland at the time the request
is made.
This section applies where the ICIR accepts a request made under section 90 .
The ICIR must—
seek information about the death to which the request relates,
produce a report about the death at the conclusion of its enquiries
into the death, and
give the report to the person who made the request.
The report must contain only information the credibility of which has been
established to the satisfaction of the ICIR.
If further (credible) information about the death is obtained by the ICIR after
the report is produced or given, the ICIR may produce and give a revised
report under
subsection (2)
(c)
.
If a report about the death has previously been produced and given under
subsection (2)
for an earlier request, it is for the ICIR to determine if, and to
what extent, it should again seek information about the death before producing
the report for the current request.
If—
before the ICIR produces or gives the report, the Legacy Commission
begins an investigation under
Part 3
of the conduct which caused the
death, and
that investigation is being carried out as a criminal investigation (which
has the meaning given by
section 91
(4)
),
the ICIR must not produce or give the report unless and until the final report on the findings of the investigation is published under section 49 .
The functions conferred by
this section
must (in particular) be exercised in
accordance with—
section 93 , and
Article 11 of the ICIR agreement.
A report produced under
this section
is referred to in
this Part
as a “family
report”.
This section applies in relation to a family report.
Before giving the report to a person under
section 92
(2)
(c)
, the ICIR must
give a draft of the report to the Secretary of State.
The Secretary of State may, during the decision period, notify the ICIR either—
that, in the Secretary of State’s view, none of the information contained
in the report would prejudice the national security interests of the
United Kingdom or put at risk the life or safety of any person, or
that, in the Secretary of State’s view, information contained in the
report would cause that prejudice or risk.
A notification under
subsection (3)
(b)
must identify the particular information
which would, in the Secretary of State’s view, cause that prejudice or risk.
The ICIR must not give the report to a person under section 92 (2) (c) unless—
the Secretary of State gives a notification under subsection (3) (a) ,
the Secretary of State gives a notification under
subsection (3)
(b)
and,
before giving the report to the person, the ICIR excludes from it all
information identified under
subsection (4)
, or
the decision period ends without the Secretary of State giving a
notification under
subsection (3)
(a)
or
(b)
.
Where—
the Secretary of State gives a notification under subsection (3) (b) , and
the ICIR does not change the report as described in subsection (5) (b) ,
this section
does not prevent the ICIR from producing a different report under
section 92
(and this section applies again in relation to any different report
that is produced).
The ICIR must not give a family report to any person except—
under section 92 (2) (c) , and
in accordance with this section .
In
this section
“decision period”, in relation to a family report, means the
period of 60 days beginning with the day on which a draft of the report is
given to the Secretary of State.
The ICIR must notify the Legacy Commission where a request under
section
90
is made.
A notification under
subsection (1)
must specify the death to which the request
relates (“the relevant death”).
After receiving a notification under
subsection (1)
, the Legacy Commission
must—
give the ICIR a notice stating whether it is carrying out an investigation
under
Part 3
of the conduct which caused the relevant death, and
if it subsequently begins such an investigation, notify the ICIR of that
fact.
The ICIR must notify the Legacy Commission of whether (under section 91 ) it accepts or rejects the request.
If the ICIR rejects the request,
subsection (3)
(b)
ceases to apply in relation to
the request.
Where the Legacy Commission notifies the ICIR under
subsection (3)
that it
is carrying out an investigation of the conduct which caused the relevant
death, the notification must state whether the investigation is being carried
out as a criminal investigation (which has the meaning given by
section 91
(4)
).
If whether or not the investigation is being carried out as a criminal
investigation subsequently changes, the Legacy Commission must notify the
ICIR of that fact.
A person who is a member of the ICIR commits an offence if their conduct
(in any part of the world) causes the ICIR to contravene the duty imposed
under
section 93
(7)
(restriction on disclosing family reports).
A person who commits an offence under this section is liable—
on summary conviction in Northern Ireland, to imprisonment for a
term not exceeding 6 months or a fine not exceeding the statutory
maximum (or both);
on summary conviction in England and Wales, to imprisonment for
a term not exceeding the general limit in a magistrates’ court or a fine
(or both);
on summary conviction in Scotland, to imprisonment for a term not
exceeding 12 months or a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum
(or both);
on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding
2 years or a fine (or both).
A person who is the holder of a relevant position commits an offence if—
the person discloses (in any part of the world except Ireland)
information about a death within the ICIR’s remit,
the person obtained the information in their capacity as the holder of
a relevant position, and
the person is not authorised by the ICIR to make the disclosure on
the ICIR’s behalf.
It is a defence for a person charged with an offence under
subsection (1)
to
prove that they reasonably believed that the ICIR had authorised them to
make the disclosure.
A person who has ceased to be the holder of a relevant position commits an
offence if—
the person discloses (in any part of the world except Ireland)
information about a death within the ICIR’s remit, and
the person obtained the information in their capacity as the holder of
a relevant position.
The communication of information to a person who holds a relevant position
is not a disclosure of the information for the purposes of
this section
.
A person who commits an offence under this section is liable—
on summary conviction in Northern Ireland, to imprisonment for a
term not exceeding 6 months or a fine not exceeding the statutory
maximum (or both);
on summary conviction in England and Wales, to imprisonment for
a term not exceeding the general limit in a magistrates’ court or a fine
(or both);
on summary conviction in Scotland, to imprisonment for a term not
exceeding 12 months or a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum
(or both);
on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding
2 years or a fine (or both).
A reference in
this section
to a person holding a relevant position is a reference
to the person being—
a member of the ICIR,
a member of the staff of the ICIR, or
an agent of, or person carrying out work for or giving advice to, the
ICIR.
Except in so far as in any particular case any privilege or immunity is waived
by the ICIR, the ICIR has immunity from suit and legal process.
Except in so far as in any particular case the ICIR waives it, the ICIR has the
like inviolability of official archives and premises as in accordance with the
1961 Convention Articles is accorded in respect of the official archives and
premises of a diplomatic mission.
But the ICIR may not waive any inviolability of official archives in so far as
they contain—
information about deaths within the ICIR’s remit, and
records that relate to such information.
The Secretary of State may by regulations—
confer on the ICIR, in such cases, to such extent and with such
modifications as the regulations may specify, any of the privileges and
immunities set out in
Part 1
of
Schedule 1
to the
International
Organisations Act 1968
which are not conferred by subsections
(1)
and
(2)
,
make provision about the waiver of such privileges and immunities.
The reference in
subsection (4)
(b)
to staff of the ICIR includes agents of, and
persons carrying out work for or giving advice to, the ICIR.
In this section “the 1961 Convention Articles” means the Articles (being certain
Articles of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations signed in 1961)
which are set out in
Schedule 1
to the
Diplomatic Privileges Act 1964
.
In the period of 6 months after the end of each financial year, the ICIR must—
produce and publish a report about that year, and
give a copy of the report to His Majesty’s Government in the United
Kingdom and to the Government of Ireland.
The report must deal with the following matters—
patterns and themes that the ICIR has identified from its work,
the level of co-operation that the ICIR has received in carrying out its
work,
the finances of the ICIR,
the administration of the ICIR,
the number of requests made under section 90 ,
the number of family reports given under section 92 , and
the volume of information about deaths received by the ICIR.
Each report must include a statement of the number of notifications under
section 93
(3)
(b)
(risk of prejudice or harm arising from family reports) which
the Secretary of State has, in the financial year concerned, given to the ICIR.
“Financial year”, in relation to the ICIR, means—
the period which—
begins with the day on which
section 90
comes into force for
all purposes, and
ends with the following 31 March; and
each subsequent period of one year which ends with 31 March.
At the end of the ICIR’s operational period, the ICIR must destroy—
all the information it holds about deaths within its remit, and
all the records it holds which relate to such information.
The ICIR’s “operational period” is the period—
beginning when the request period begins, and
ending 6 months after the end of the request period.
Section 90
(4)
(meaning of “request period”) applies for the purposes of this
subsection.
The Secretary of State may by regulations amend
subsection (2)
(b)
so as to
increase or decrease the number of months for the time being specified in
that provision.
The Secretary of State may by regulations make provision for bringing to an
end the ICIR’s functions under this Part after the end of the operational
period.
Regulations under subsection (4) may (in particular) make provision for—
winding up the ICIR in its legal capacities as a body corporate, and
the transfer of property, rights and liabilities (whether or not otherwise
capable of being transferred), including any acquired or arising after
the regulations are made.
Regulations under
subsection (4)
may (in particular) repeal or otherwise
amend any provision of this Part other than—
section 89 (5) to (7) ,
section 96 (3) to (6) ,
section 97 , and
this section.
Regulations under
subsection (4)
may make provision about cases where the
ICIR concludes its enquiries into a death but is unable to produce and give
a report about the death under
section 92
(2)
before the end of the operational
period, including provision postponing the application of
subsection (1)
to
information about the death and related records until the ICIR gives the
report.
Before making regulations under
subsection (4)
, the Secretary of State must
consult—
the Government of Ireland, and
any other person the Secretary of State considers appropriate.
The provision that may be made in regulations under
subsection (4)
by virtue
of
section 112
(5)
includes provision to secure that the information and records
referred to in
subsection (1)
are destroyed (whether by the ICIR or otherwise).
Regulations under this section are subject to affirmative procedure.
If a draft of an instrument containing regulations under
subsection (4)
would,
apart from this subsection, be treated for the purposes of the Standing Orders
of either House of Parliament as a hybrid instrument, it is to proceed in that
House as if it were not a hybrid instrument.
The Coroners Act (Northern Ireland) 1959 is amended as follows.
In
section 16A
(closure of inquests into deaths resulting directly from the
Troubles)—
“(1)
This section applies to an inquest into a death that resulted
directly from the Troubles if—(a)
the inquest was initiated before 1 May 2024 but not
allocated to a coroner before that day, or(b)
the inquest was initiated and allocated to a coroner
before 1 May 2024 but the coroner ceased progressing the inquest before that day for reasons relating to public interest immunity.”;
“(5)
Subsections (2) and (3) are subject to section 16AB (2) (a) (inquests resumed at direction of Advocate General).”
“16AA Stopped inquests: duty of coroners to resume formerly active inquests
(1)
This section applies to an inquest into a death that resulted directly
from the Troubles if—(a)
the inquest was initiated and allocated to a coroner before 1
May 2024,(b)
the coroner did not cease progressing the inquest before that
day for reasons relating to public interest immunity, and(c)
section 16A (as it had effect on 1 May 2024) required the
coroner to close the inquest.(2)
The coroner must resume and conduct the inquest.
(3)
If the coroner is unable to do so, the Presiding coroner must allocate
the inquest to another coroner for the purposes of subsection (2) .16AB Stopped inquests: power of Advocate General to give directions
(1)
This section applies to an inquest into a death that resulted directly
from the Troubles if the inquest was initiated before 1 May 2024 by virtue of a direction under section 14 but not allocated to a coroner before that day.(2)
The Advocate General for Northern Ireland (“the Advocate General”)
must either—(a)
direct the Presiding coroner to allocate the inquest to a coroner
(who must resume and conduct the inquest), or(b)
direct the senior judicial panel member, appointed under the
Northern Ireland Troubles Act 2026, that section 58 of that Act applies to the death.(3)
For the purposes of deciding which kind of direction to give under subsection (2) , the Advocate General may require the Presiding coroner
to provide any information held by the Presiding coroner in connection with the inquest.(4)
In deciding which kind of direction to give under subsection (2) , the
Advocate General must (in particular) take into account—(a)
whether timely progress is more likely to be made by resuming
the inquest or by carrying out the inquisitorial proceedings (under Part 4 of the Northern Ireland Troubles Act 2026),(b)
the views of known family members of the person to whose
death the inquest relates on which kind of direction should be given, and(c)
the views of relevant authorities on which kind of direction
should be given.(5)
The Advocate General must give a direction under subsection (2) (b) if sensitive information would be—
(a)
likely to be disclosed in the course of a resumed inquest or
inquisitorial proceedings, or(b)
likely to be withheld from a resumed inquest on grounds of
public interest immunity,unless, in all the circumstances and taking into account the factors specified in subsection (4) , they consider it appropriate to give a direction under subsection (2) (a) .
(6)
(a)
a family member is “known” if they are known to the Advocate
General by virtue of any of the Advocate General’s functions, and(b)
“relevant authority” and “sensitive information” have the same
meanings as in the Northern Ireland Troubles Act 2026.(7)
The Advocate General must give the direction under subsection (2) before the end of the decision period, unless it is not practicable to do so (in which case the direction must be given as soon as practicable after the end of that period).
(8)
The “decision period” is the period of 18 months beginning with the
day on which this section comes into force for all purposes.16AC Resumed inquests: general provision
(1)
Rules under section 36(1)(b) may make provision about a resumed
inquest, including provision—(a)
for a resumed inquest to proceed (for all or certain purposes)
as a fresh inquest or an inquest resumed after being adjourned;(b)
for things previously done in connection with a resumed
inquest—(i)
to be taken into account,
(ii)
to be ignored, or
(iii)
to continue to have, to again have, or to cease to have,
effect;(2)
A coroner conducting a resumed inquest must not do anything which
duplicates anything previously done in connection with the inquest unless, in the coroner’s view, the duplication is essential.(3)
The Presiding coroner must consult the Advocate General for Northern
Ireland before issuing guidance about the management or conduct of resumed inquests (including guidance relating to the welfare of individuals who give evidence to, or otherwise participate in, such inquests).(4)
A coroner must have regard to guidance issued by the Presiding
coroner about the management or conduct of resumed inquests.16AD Resumed inquests: live links
(1)
A person required by a coroner to give evidence at a resumed inquest
may apply to the coroner for permission to give that evidence through a live audio link or live video link (and may do so if permission is given).(2)
The coroner must give permission unless they consider that it is
impracticable for the person to give evidence in that manner.(3)
Permission may be given whether the person is in the United Kingdom
or elsewhere.(4)
If the coroner refuses or withdraws permission, they must give reasons
to the person.(5)
A statement made on oath by a person outside Northern Ireland and
given in evidence through a live audio link or live video link under this section is to be treated for the purposes of Article 3 of the Perjury
(Northern Ireland) Order 1979 (S.I. 1979/1714 (N.I. 19)) as having been made in the inquest in which it is given in evidence.(6)
In this section—
“
live audio link” is a live telephone link or other arrangement
which—(a)
enables a person (“P”) to hear all other persons
attending an inquest who are not in the same location as P, and(b)
enables all other persons attending an inquest who are
not in the same location as P to hear P;“
live video link” is a live television link or other arrangement
which—(a)
enables a person (“P”) to see and hear all other persons
attending an inquest who are not in the same location as P, and(b)
enables all other persons attending an inquest who are
not in the same location as P to see and hear P.(7)
The extent (if any) to which a person is unable to hear or see by reason
of any impairment of hearing or eyesight is to be disregarded for the purposes of subsection (6) .16AE Resumed inquests: initial contact with members of armed forces
(1)
This section applies where—
(a)
for the purposes of a resumed inquest, the coroner conducting
the inquest decides to contact a person (“P”) in connection with P’s conduct as a member of the armed forces which is conduct forming part of the Troubles, and(b)
a coroner has not previously contacted P for the purposes of
the inquest after the coming into force of this section.(2)
The coroner must notify the Secretary of State of—
(a)
the decision to contact P,
(b)
the death to which the inquest relates, and
(c)
P’s contact details (so far as known).
(3)
The Secretary of State must, as soon as practicable after being notified
under subsection (2) , take all reasonable steps to make P aware of the coroner’s decision to contact them.(4)
If the Secretary of State makes P aware of the decision, the Secretary
of State must notify the coroner of that fact.(5)
The coroner may not contact P for the purposes of the inquest until
whichever of the following occurs first—(a)
the coroner being notified under subsection (4) that P is aware
of the decision, or(b)
the end of the period of 14 days beginning with the day on
which the Secretary of State is notified under subsection (2) of the decision.(6)
In this section “contacting a person” includes—
(a)
imposing a requirement on the person under section 17A, or
(b)
otherwise requiring the person to provide information or
produce a document or other thing.16AF Coroners to notify deaths subject to inquisitorial proceedings
(1)
Where a coroner ceases progressing a resumed inquest for reasons
relating to public interest immunity, they must notify the senior judicial panel member (within the meaning of the Northern Ireland Troubles Act 2026) of that fact.(2)
Where the senior judicial panel member receives a notification under subsection (1) from a coroner, they must—
(a)
determine whether section 58 of the Northern Ireland Troubles
Act 2026 applies to the death to which the inquest relates, and(b)
if they determine that section does apply to the death, notify
the coroner of that determination.(3)
If a coroner receives a notification under subsection (2) (b) about a
death and they have not yet closed the inquest mentioned in subsection
(1) , they must close it (including by discharging any jury that has been summoned).(4)
A duty imposed by this section must be complied with as soon as
practicable.”
In section 16C (interpretation)—
in subsection (1) , for “and 16B” substitute “to 16B”;
“(5)
An inquest is “allocated” to a coroner if, after being initiated,
the Presiding coroner makes that coroner responsible for conducting the inquest to its conclusion.(6)
A “resumed inquest” is an inquest resumed in accordance
with—(a)
section 16AA , or
(b)
a direction given to the Presiding coroner under section
16AB .(7)
A coroner ceases progressing an inquest “for reasons relating
to public interest immunity” if—(a)
evidence or documents are (or are to be) withheld from
the inquest on grounds of public interest immunity, and(b)
the coroner considers that, without the evidence or
documents, it is not possible for a final determination, verdict or findings to be made or given at the inquest.”
The Legacy Commission must produce a record (“the historical record”) of
deaths that were caused by conduct forming part of the Troubles.
The historical record is to consist of a single document which gives an account
of the circumstances in which each of the relevant deaths occurred.
The Legacy Commission must take all reasonable steps—
to identify all deaths that were caused by conduct forming part of the
Troubles, and
to identify and obtain—
the information about the relevant deaths that is publicly
available, and
other information about the relevant deaths which the Legacy
Commission considers is likely to be of use in producing the
historical record.
The Legacy Commission may request a person to provide information in
connection with the production of the historical record.
But it may not request information that relates to a relevant death, or to the
event in which that death occurred (“the relevant event”), to be provided
by—
a member of the family of the deceased,
a person who suffered physical or mental harm as a result of the
relevant event or a member of that person’s family, or
a member of the family of any other person whose death was caused
by conduct forming part of the relevant event.
Subsection
(5)
does not prevent the Legacy Commission from making a request
to a person in their capacity as the holder of an employment, office or other
position.
A person may provide information if requested to do so by the Legacy
Commission, but only if the provision of the information would not
contravene—
any obligation of confidence owed by the person, or
any other restriction on the disclosure of information (however
imposed).
When deciding whether it is reasonable to take a particular step for the
purposes of
subsection (3)
(a)
or
(b)
, the Legacy Commission may (in particular)
take into account whether that step would, in its view, involve
disproportionate effort or cost.
In
this section
“relevant deaths” means those deaths which the Legacy
Commission identifies, after taking all reasonable steps in accordance with
subsection (3)
(a)
, as deaths that were caused by conduct forming part of the
Troubles, except those deaths for which investigations under
Part 3
or
inquisitorial proceedings are carried out.
The Legacy Commission must publish the historical record, in such manner
as it considers appropriate.
This section
does not require the Legacy Commission to publish the historical
record unless (and until) it can do so in accordance with
sections 12
(1)
and
20
(2)
.
The
Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023
is
amended as follows.
In section 38 (criminal investigations of Troubles-related offences)—
for the heading substitute “Criminal investigations of Troubles-related
offences”;
“(1)
No criminal investigation of any serious or connected
Troubles-related offence may be continued or begun by a person other than the Legacy Commission.”;
omit subsections (2) and (3) .
Omit
section 41
(other Troubles-related offences: prohibition of criminal
enforcement action).
In section 42 (3) for “the ICRIR” substitute “the Legacy Commission”.
The Director of Public Prosecutions for Northern Ireland and the Director of
Public Prosecutions (for England and Wales) must jointly issue guidance
about the prosecution of Troubles-related offences.
The guidance must, in particular, set out evidential matters and public interest
factors that are likely to be relevant to a decision to prosecute a person for
such an offence.
The Director of Public Prosecutions for Northern Ireland and Public
Prosecutors must have regard to the guidance, so far as it applies to
prosecutions in Northern Ireland, when deciding whether to prosecute a
person in Northern Ireland for such an offence.
The Director of Public Prosecutions and Crown Prosecutors must have regard
to the guidance, so far as it applies to prosecutions in England and Wales,
when deciding whether to prosecute a person in England and Wales for such
an offence.
The first guidance under this section must be issued as soon as practicable
after the coming into force of this section.
In this section “Troubles-related offence” means an offence under the law of
Northern Ireland or England and Wales where the conduct constituting the
offence was to any extent conduct forming part of the Troubles.
The
Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023
is
amended as follows.
In
section 40
(restrictions on criminal enforcement action), after subsection Subsections (2) and (4) are subject to
section 40A
(consent requirement
(7) insert—
“(7A)
for prosecution of indictable-only offences).”
“40A Consent requirement for prosecution of indictable-only
Troubles-related offences(1)
Where—
(a)
section 40(2) or (4) authorises criminal enforcement action
against P in respect of an offence under the law of Northern Ireland, and(b)
the offence is triable only on indictment,
no proceedings may be instituted against P for the offence except with the consent of the Advocate General for Northern Ireland.
(2)
Where—
(a)
section 40(2) or (4) authorises criminal enforcement action
against P in respect of an offence under the law of England and Wales, and(b)
the offence is triable only on indictment,
no proceedings may be instituted against P for the offence except with the consent of the Attorney General.
(3)
Subsections (1) and (2) do not limit any power to arrest or otherwise
detain P in accordance with section 40.”
Criminal proceedings for an offence are not to be stayed, and a decision to
prosecute a person for an offence is not to be quashed, on a ground founded
to any extent on the content of an on the run letter.
In this section—
“on the run letter” means a document relating to a person’s liability
to arrest or prosecution that—
was created during the period beginning with 1 June 2000 and
ending with 7 March 2014, and
is of a kind referred to in Chapter 4, 5 or 6 of the Report of
the Hallett Review, laid before Parliament on 17 July 2014;
criminal proceedings being “stayed” includes—
being stayed for abuse of process;
being deserted simpliciter in Scotland because the court
considers it would be oppressive to require the accused to face
trial or unfair to allow the Crown to proceed.
The
Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023
is
amended as follows.
In the italic heading preceding section 43 omit “Civil proceedings,”.
Omit section 43 (tort, delict and fatal accident actions).
In consequence of that repeal—
omit
Schedule 9
(determination of whether the prohibition on civil
actions applies);
omit
Schedule 10
(civil actions to which the 2008 Mediation Directive
applies);
in Schedule 13 (amendments) omit Part 2 .
The Secretary of State—
must appoint an independent person to carry out a review, by the
second anniversary of the commencement day, of the effect of the
provisions and guidance mentioned in
subsection (2)
on persons who
were members of the armed forces or a police force during the
Troubles;
may, at any time after the completion of that review, appoint an
independent person to carry out a further such review.
The provisions and guidance referred to in subsection (1) are—
section 17
(2)
(b)
so far as it limits the power under that provision to
require a person to attend at a specified place to cases where it would
be impracticable to provide the information through a live audio or
video link;
section 43
(10)
(duty to obtain and review certain information before
contacting witnesses);
section 51
(6)
(duty to seek prosecutor’s advice before referring conduct
to prosecutor);
section 64 (restrictions on public access etc to inquisitorial proceedings);
section 81 (duty to have regard to welfare of witnesses etc);
section 82
(investigations and inquisitorial proceedings: initial contact
with members of armed forces as witnesses);
section 16AE
of the
Coroners Act (Northern Ireland) 1959
(resumed
inquests: initial contact with members of armed forces);
any regulations made under
section 83
(initial contact with police
officers);
any guidance issued by the Presiding coroner relating to the welfare
of people who give evidence to, or otherwise participate in, resumed
inquests within the meaning of
section 16C
of the
Coroners Act
(Northern Ireland) 1959
.
On completion of a review, the appointed person must give a report, setting
out the result of the review, to the Secretary of State and the Legacy
Commission.
The Secretary of State must lay before Parliament—
a copy of the report, and
a document setting out the Secretary of State’s response to the report.
The Secretary of State may make payments to a person appointed under this
section.
In subsection (1) —
“the commencement day” means the first day on which any provision
mentioned in
subsection (2)
(a)
to
(g)
is in force, or any regulations
mentioned in
subsection (2)
(h)
are in force, for all purposes;
“independent person” means a person appearing to the Secretary of
State to be independent of the Secretary of State and the Legacy
Commission;
the reference in
paragraph (a)
to the effect on the persons mentioned
in that paragraph is a reference to the effect on them in their capacity
as persons who were members of the armed forces or a police force
during the Troubles.
It is lawful for a Minister of State or Under-Secretary of State to make an
interim custody order on behalf of the Secretary of State.
Any order so made is to be treated as an order of the Secretary of State.
In this section “interim custody order” means an interim custody order
under—
article 4 of the Detention of Terrorists (Northern Ireland) Order 1972
(S.I. 1972/1632 (N.I. 15)), or
paragraph 11 of Schedule 1 to the Northern Ireland (Emergency
Provisions) Act 1973.
This section is to be treated as always having had effect.
Where, before the coming into force of
section 109
, a conviction for an offence
was quashed only because an interim custody order (within the meaning of
that section) was made otherwise than by the Secretary of State acting
personally—
that section does not affect the quashing of the conviction, but
the quashing of the conviction is to be disregarded for the purposes
of section 133 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 (compensation for
miscarriages of justice).
In the Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023 , omit sections 46 and 47 (and the italic heading before section 46).
Schedule 6
amends the
Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation)
Act 2023
and other legislation.
The following may by regulations make provision that is consequential on
this Act—
the Secretary of State;
the Department of Justice in Northern Ireland;
the Scottish Ministers.
Regulations under subsection (2) may amend or repeal primary legislation.
Regulations under
subsection (2)
are subject to affirmative procedure if they
amend or repeal primary legislation.
Any other regulations under subsection (2) are subject to negative procedure.
The power of the Department of Justice in Northern Ireland or the Scottish
Ministers to make regulations under
subsection (2)
is subject to
section 112
(6)
or
(7)
(as is relevant).
The Secretary of State may by regulations—
replace a reference in provision made by this Act to the commencement
of a provision with a reference to the actual date on which the
provision comes into force;
replace a reference in provision made by this Act to a date determined
by reference to the commencement of a provision with a reference to
the actual date so determined;
In this section “primary legislation” means—
an Act of Parliament,
Northern Ireland legislation,
an Act of the Scottish Parliament, or
an Act of Senedd Cymru.
Regulations under this Act of the Secretary of State are to be made by statutory
instrument.
A power of the Department of Justice in Northern Ireland to make regulations
under this Act is exercisable by statutory rule for the purposes of the
Statutory
Rules (Northern Ireland) Order 1979
(S.I. 1979/1573 (N.I. 12)).
Where regulations under this Act are “subject to affirmative procedure” they
are to be made by a person mentioned in the first column of the following
table in accordance with the procedure specified in corresponding entry in
the second column.
|
Person making the regulations |
The procedure |
|---|---|
|
Secretary of State |
The regulations may not be made unless a draft of the statutory instrument containing them has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament |
|
Department of Justice in Northern Ireland |
The regulations may not be made unless a draft of them has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, the Northern Ireland Assembly |
|
Scottish Ministers |
The regulations are subject to the affirmative
procedure (see
section 29
of the
Interpretation and |
Where regulations under this Act are “subject to negative procedure” they
are to be made by a person mentioned in the first column of the following
table in accordance with the procedure specified in corresponding entry in
the second column.
|
Person making the regulations |
The procedure |
|---|---|
|
Secretary of State |
The statutory instrument containing the regulations is subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament |
|
Department of Justice in Northern Ireland |
The regulations are subject to negative resolution (within the meaning of section 41 (6) of the Interpretation Act (Northern Ireland) 1954 ) |
|
Scottish Ministers |
The regulations are subject to the negative
procedure (see
section 28
of the
Interpretation |
Regulations under this Act may make—
different provision for different purposes;
incidental, supplementary or consequential provision;
transitional or transitory provision or savings.
Regulations under this Act of the Department of Justice in Northern Ireland
may only make provision that is—
within devolved competence, or
reserved provision, provided that the Secretary of State consents to
that provision being made.
Regulations under this Act of the Scottish Ministers may only make provision
that is within devolved competence.
For the purposes of
subsections (6)
and
(7)
, provision is “within devolved
competence”—
in relation to the Department of Justice in Northern Ireland, if it—
would be within the legislative competence of the Northern
Ireland Assembly if it were contained in an Act of that
Assembly, and
would not, if it were contained in a Bill in the Northern Ireland
Assembly, result in the Bill requiring the consent of the
Secretary of State under
section 8
of the
Northern Ireland Act
1998
;
in relation to the Scottish Ministers, if it would be within the legislative
competence of the Scottish Parliament if it were contained in an Act
of that Parliament.
For the purposes of
subsection (6)
, “reserved provision” means provision
which, if it were contained in a Bill in the Northern Ireland Assembly, would
result in the Bill requiring the consent of the Secretary of State under
section
8
(b)
of the
Northern Ireland Act 1998
.
This section applies for the purposes of determining whether one person (F)
is a close family member of another person (D) who has died.
F is a close family member of D if—
F was the spouse, civil partner or co-habitee of D on the day of D’s
death,
F is a child or step-child of D,
F is a parent of D,
F is a brother, half-brother or step-brother of D,
F is a sister, half-sister or step-sister of D, or
F was a step-parent of D on the day of D’s death or is a step-parent
of D on the relevant day.
Where this section applies for the purposes of—
section 34
, the “relevant day” is the day on which the request under
that section is made;
section 40 , the “relevant day” is the day on which the request under section 35 is made or the investigation is initiated under section 39 ;
section 48
(5)
, the “relevant day” is the day on which the request for
the investigation is made or the investigation is initiated;
section 60
or
61
, the “relevant day” is the day on which inquisitorial
proceedings in respect of the death concerned are allocated to a judicial
panel member under
section 58
;
section 79 , the “relevant day” is—
in the case of an investigation under Part 3, the day on which
the request for the investigation is made or the investigation
is initiated;
in the case of inquisitorial proceedings, the day on which
inquisitorial proceedings in respect of the death concerned are
allocated to a judicial panel member under
section 58
;
paragraph 8
(5)
(a)
of
Schedule 5
, the “relevant day” is the day on which
the request for the investigation is made or the investigation is initiated.
F was the “co-habitee” of D on the day of D’s death if—
on that day F was living in the same household as D in a relationship
with D corresponding to marriage or to civil partnership, and
F had been doing so for a period of at least two years ending with
that day.
F is a “step-child” of D if F is a child of a person—
who was the spouse, civil partner or co-habitee of D on the day of
D’s death, or
who had ceased to be the spouse, civil partner or co-habitee of D on
any day within the period of two years ending with the day of D’s
death.
F was, or is, a “step-parent” of D on a particular day if F—
was, or is, the spouse, civil partner or co-habitee of a parent of D on
that day, or
had ceased to be the spouse, civil partner or co-habitee of a parent of
D on any day within the period of two years ending with that day.
F is the “step-brother” or “step-sister” of D if F is a child of a person—
who was the spouse, civil partner or co-habitee of a parent of D on
day of D’s death, or
who had ceased to be the spouse, civil partner or co-habitee of a parent
of D on any day within the period of two years ending with the day
of D’s death.
For the purposes of subsection
(5)
,
(6)
or
(7)
, one person (A) is, or was, the
co-habitee of another person (B) at a particular time if—
at that time A is, or was, living in the same household as B in a
relationship with B corresponding to marriage or to civil partnership,
and
A has been, or had been, doing so for a period of at least two years
ending with that day.
In this Act—
“
armed forces” means any of His Majesty’s forces (within the meaning
of the Armed Forces Act 2006);
a death being “caused directly” by conduct forming part of the Troubles has the meaning given by section 2 ;
“
chief officer”, in relation to a police force, includes—
the Chief Constable of the PSNI,
the chief constable of the Ministry of Defence Police, and
the chief constable of the British Transport Police;
“
close family member” is to be read in accordance with
section 113
;
“
Commissioner” means a person appointed under
section 5
;
“
conduct” has the meaning given by
section 2
;
“
contravene” includes fails to comply;
“
Director of Investigations” means a person appointed under
section 6
;
“
forming part of the Troubles”, in relation to an event or conduct, has
the meaning given by
section 2
;
“
inquisitorial proceedings” has the meaning given by
section 56
;
inquisitorial proceedings are “carried out” during the period described in section 59 (11) ;
“
the inspectorate” has the meaning given by
section 27
;
“
Legacy Commission contractor” has the meaning given by
section 21
;
“
Legacy Commission officers” has the meaning given by
section 8
;
“
police force” includes—
the PSNI,
the Ministry of Defence Police, and
the British Transport Police;
“
prejudicial information” has the meaning given by
section 19
;
“
protected international information” has the meaning given by
section
19
;
“
PSNI” means the Police Service of Northern Ireland;
“
relevant authority” has the meaning given by
section 16
;
“
the relevant Director of Investigations” has the meaning given by
section
38
(11)
;
“
the relevant judicial panel member” has the meaning given by
section
59
(12)
;
“
sensitive information” has the meaning given by
section 19
;
“
subject to affirmative procedure” and “subject to negative procedure”
have the meanings given by
section 112
;
“
the Troubles” has the meaning given by
section 2
.
This Act binds the Crown.
Any amendment or repeal made by this Act has the same extent as the
provision amended or repealed.
The following come into force on the day on which this Act is passed—
any provision of or amendment made by this Act so far as it confers
or relates to a power to make regulations;
this Part , other than section 111 (1) and Schedule 6 .
Sections 109
and
110
come into force at the end of the period of two months
beginning with the day on which this Act is passed.
Subject to
subsections (1)
and
(2)
, this Act comes into force on such day as
the Secretary of State may by regulations appoint.
Before making the first regulations under
subsection (3)
that appoint a day
on which any provision of Parts 3 to 7 comes into force, the Secretary of State
must lay before Parliament a statement about the actions taken by His
Majesty’s Government in the United Kingdom and the Government of Ireland
in pursuance of the joint framework on addressing the legacy of the past
(published on 19 September 2025).
The following may by regulations make transitory, transitional or saving
provision in connection with the coming into force of any provision of this
Act—
the Secretary of State;
the Department of Justice in Northern Ireland;
the Scottish Ministers.
This Act may be cited as the Northern Ireland Troubles Act 2026.
The Legacy Commission is not to be regarded as the servant or agent of
the Crown or as enjoying any status, immunity or privilege of the Crown.
The Legacy Commission may do anything that it thinks necessary or
expedient in connection with the exercise of—
its functions,
the functions of the oversight board.
In particular, the Legacy Commission may—
enter into contracts and other agreements (whether legally binding
or not), and
acquire and dispose of property (including land).
But the Legacy Commission may not borrow money.
The Legacy Commission may make payments of, or payments towards the
provision of, any remuneration, pensions, allowances, gratuities or
compensation payable to, or in respect of—
the Commissioners;
judicial panel members;
Legacy Commission officers.
The Legacy Commission may regulate its own proceedings (including
quorum).
The validity of any proceedings of the Legacy Commission is not affected
by—
any vacancy in the membership of the Legacy Commission;
The oversight board may regulate its own proceedings (including quorum).
The validity of any proceedings of the oversight board is not affected by—
any vacancy in the membership of the board;
any defect in the appointment of any Commissioner or in the
employment or secondment of the Chief Executive Officer.
Any function of the Legacy Commission may be exercised on behalf of,
and in the name of, the Legacy Commission by—
a Commissioner,
a judicial panel member, or
a Legacy Commission officer,
who has been authorised (whether generally or specifically) by the oversight board for that purpose.
Any function of the Legacy Commission may be exercised on behalf of,
and in the name of, the Legacy Commission by the oversight board if the
board has authorised itself (whether generally or specifically) for that
purpose.
Any relevant function of the Chief Executive Officer may be exercised by
a Legacy Commission officer, other than a Director of Investigations, who
has been authorised (whether generally or specifically) by the oversight
board for that purpose if—
the Chief Executive Officer is unable to exercise that function, or
the role of Chief Executive Officer is vacant.
The Chief Executive Officer’s “relevant functions” are—
their functions under Part 3 of this Act,
their functions under paragraph 17 (2) of this Schedule, and
any function of the Legacy Commission which the oversight board
has authorised the Chief Executive Officer (by virtue of
sub-paragraph (1)
) to exercise.
The Legacy Commission may have a seal.
The application of the Legacy Commission’s seal must be authenticated by
the signature of at least one of the Commissioners.
This paragraph
does not prevent the Legacy Commission from acting
otherwise than by a document under seal.
A document purporting to be duly executed under the seal of the Legacy
Commission is to be received in evidence and treated as so executed unless
the contrary is shown.
A document purporting to be signed on behalf of the Legacy Commission
by—
at least one of the Commissioners, or
any person who is authorised (generally or specifically) for that
purpose,
is to be received in evidence and treated as so signed unless the contrary is shown.
The Legacy Commission must—
keep proper accounts and proper records in relation to them, and
prepare a statement of accounts in respect of each financial year.
The statement of accounts must be prepared in accordance with any
directions that are given by the Treasury.
As soon as practicable after the end of a financial year, the Legacy
Commission must send a copy of its statement of accounts for that financial
year to—
the Secretary of State, and
the Comptroller and Auditor General.
The Comptroller and Auditor General must—
examine, certify and report on each statement of accounts,
send a copy of each report and certified statement to the Secretary
of State, and
lay before Parliament a copy of each such report and certified
statement.
“Financial year” has the meaning given by section 26 .
A person may not be appointed as a Commissioner if—
the person has been convicted (anywhere in the world) of an offence,
the person is insolvent,
the person is disqualified from being a company director, or
the Secretary of State considers that there is a matter which—
would give rise to a conflict of interest in respect of their
work as a Commissioner, or
would otherwise affect their ability to carry out that work
fairly and impartially.
A person’s current or previous appointment to a relevant role does not
prevent the person from being appointed again to a relevant role.
But a person who has been removed from office in accordance with paragraph 13 (2) and (3) may not be appointed to a relevant role.
Appointment “to a relevant role” means appointment as a Commissioner,
Director of Investigations or judicial panel member.
For the purposes of this Schedule a person is “insolvent” if—
the person has become bankrupt or is an undischarged bankrupt,
the person has become the subject of a bankruptcy restrictions order,
a debt relief order or a debt relief restrictions order has been made
in respect of the person,
the person has made a composition or arrangement with his or her
creditors, or granted a trust deed for his or her creditors, or
under the law of Scotland, the person’s estate has been sequestrated
and the person has not been discharged.
For the purposes of this Schedule a person is “disqualified from being a
company director” if the person is subject to—
a disqualification order or disqualification undertaking under the Company Directors Disqualification (Northern Ireland) Order 2002 (S.I. 2002/3150 (N.I. 4)),
any order, undertaking or other provision under the law of England
and Wales or Scotland that has a corresponding effect,
an order under
Article 86
(1)
of the
Judgments Enforcement (Northern
Ireland) Order 1981
(S.I. 1981/226 (N.I. 6)), or
any order, undertaking or other provision under the law of England
and Wales or Scotland that has a corresponding effect.
The following Orders apply to the Commissioners as they apply to
constables—
the
Rehabilitation of Offenders (Exceptions) Order (Northern Ireland)
1979
(S.R. (N.I.) 1979 No. 195);
the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 (Exceptions) Order 1975 (S.I. 1975/1023);
the
Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 (Exclusions and Exceptions)
(Scotland) Order 2013
(S.S.I. 2013/50).
A person who holds a relevant office may not be appointed as a
Commissioner.
A person ceases to be a Commissioner if the person begins to hold a
relevant office.
In
this Schedule
a reference to a person holding a “relevant office” is to
the person—
holding an office which is a relevant elective office or relevant
Scottish elective office, as defined by
section 37
of the
Elections Act
2022
,
holding an office to which a person may be elected by a municipal
election in the City, as defined by
section 191
(1)
of the
Representation of the People Act 1983
(municipal elections in the
City of London), or
being a member of—
the Dáil Éireann (House of Representatives of Ireland),
the Seanad Éireann (Senate of Ireland),
a city council, county council or city and county council in
Ireland, or
the European Parliament.
The appointment of a person as a Commissioner is for a term which—
is of a duration, not exceeding five years, determined by the
Secretary of State, and
begins with the day determined by the Secretary of State.
This is subject to paragraph 10 (2) , 13 and 14 (resignation, removal etc).
The other terms of a person’s appointment as a Commissioner are to be
determined by the Secretary of State.
The Secretary of State may pay a person compensation on ceasing to be a
Commissioner if it appears to the Secretary of State that there are special
circumstances which make it right for the person to receive the
compensation.
The Secretary of State may require—
a Commissioner, or
a person who is being considered for appointment as a
Commissioner,
to provide the Secretary of State with information about any relevant matter.
In
this paragraph
“relevant matter” means any matter which might
reasonably be expected to—
give rise to a conflict of interest in respect of a person’s work as a
Commissioner, or
otherwise affect a person’s ability to carry out the work as a
Commissioner fairly and impartially.
A person ceases to be a Commissioner if the person gives the Secretary of
State written notice of resignation.
The Secretary of State may call on a Commissioner to resign—
if the Commissioner is convicted (anywhere in the world) of an
offence,
if the Commissioner is insolvent (see paragraph 9 (5) ),
if the Commissioner is disqualified from being a company director
(see
paragraph 9
(6)
), or
if the Secretary of State considers (whether following the provision
of information under
paragraph 12
or otherwise) that there is a
matter which—
gives rise to a conflict of interest in respect of the
Commissioner’s work, or
otherwise affects the Commissioner’s ability to carry out
their work fairly and impartially.
If the Secretary of State calls on a Commissioner to resign, the Commissioner
must resign—
on the date specified by the Secretary of State, or
on any earlier date which the Commissioner agrees with the
Secretary of State.
The Secretary of State may terminate the term of a person who is a
pre-commencement Commissioner by giving the person a notice specifying
the date on which the person ceases to be a Commissioner.
In this paragraph “pre-commencement Commissioner” means a person
who, on the day on which this Act is passed, is a Commissioner within
the meaning of the Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation)
Act 2023.
Any function conferred, by any provision other than
section 15
(2)
, on a
Director of Investigations may be exercised on behalf of, and in the name
of, the Director by a Legacy Commission officer who has been authorised
(whether generally or specifically) by the Director for that purpose.
This paragraph applies in relation to a function conferred on the Directors
of Investigations acting jointly.
Where a Director of Investigations notifies the Chief Executive Officer in
writing that, as regards a particular matter, the Directors of Investigations—
are not in agreement as to whether the function should be exercised,
or
are not in agreement as to how the function should be exercised,
the Directors of Investigations must comply with any direction in writing given by the oversight board as to the exercise of that function.
A Director of Investigations is not to be regarded as in police service for
the purposes of any of the following—
Article 145 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Northern
Ireland) Order 1995 (S.I. 1995/1980 (N.I. 12));
Article 243 of the Employment Rights (Northern Ireland) Order 1996
(S.I. 1996/1919 (N.I. 16));
section 280 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation)
Act 1992;
section 200 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The Legacy Commission is to determine—
the number of employed Legacy Commission officers, and
the terms of their employment.
Seconded Legacy Commission officers are under the direction and control
of the Legacy Commission in the same way as employed Legacy
Commission officers are.
In the case of the secondment of a member of a police force to be a
seconded Legacy Commission officer—
arrangements for the secondment are to be made with the chief
officer of that police force, and
the arrangements must provide for the Legacy Commission to pay
the policing body responsible for that police force the amount that
is specified in, or determined in accordance with, the arrangements.
If a seconded Legacy Commission officer is a constable in any police force,
the powers and privileges which that person has by virtue of being a
constable are not exercisable while they are a seconded Legacy Commission
officer (but see
section 15
, which enables designated officers to exercise the
powers and privileges of a constable).
Service as a seconded Legacy Commission officer is—
relevant service for the purposes of
section 27
of the
Police (Northern
Ireland) Act 1998
(members of the PSNI engaged on other police
service), if the person seconded is a member of the PSNI,
relevant service for the purposes of section 97 of the Police Act 1996 (police officers engaged on service outside their force), if the person seconded is a member of a police force as defined in section 101 of that Act ), and
temporary service outwith the Police Service of Scotland under
section 15
(1)
of the
Police and Fire Reform (Scotland) Act 2012
(asp
8), if the person seconded is a constable in the Police Service of
Scotland.
If a member of the PSNI is a seconded Legacy Commission officer, the
application of—
section 35 of the Police (Northern Ireland) Act 1998 , or
any provision under the law of England and Wales or Scotland that
has a corresponding effect,
to the person does not affect the person’s ability, as a Legacy Commission officer, to be a member of any trade union or association.
In
this paragraph
, the reference to the policing body responsible for a police
force is to be interpreted in accordance with the following Table.
|
Police force |
Policing body responsible for the force |
|---|---|
|
PSNI |
Northern Ireland Policing Board |
|
a police force maintained
under
section 2
of the
Police |
The Police and Crime Commissioner for the police area for which that force is maintained |
|
metropolitan police force |
Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime |
|
City of London police force |
Common Council of the City of London as police authority for the City of London police area |
|
Police Service of Scotland |
Scottish Police Authority |
|
Ministry of Defence Police |
Secretary of State |
|
British Transport Police |
British Transport Police Authority |
A person who holds a relevant office may not become a Legacy Commission
officer.
A person ceases to be a Legacy Commission officer if the person begins to
hold a relevant office.
For the meaning of references in
this paragraph
to holding a relevant office,
see
paragraph 10
(3)
.
This paragraph
does not apply to a Director of Investigations (but see
Part
3
of this Schedule).
The following Orders apply to Legacy Commission officers as they apply
to constables—
This paragraph
does not apply to a Director of Investigations (but see
Part
3
of this Schedule).
The Legacy Commission may, in such cases and to such extent as appear
to the Legacy Commission to be appropriate, pay—
any damages, or any costs or, in Scotland, expenses, awarded against
a Legacy Commission officer in proceedings for any unlawful
conduct of that Legacy Commission officer;
any costs or, in Scotland, expenses incurred and not recovered by
a Legacy Commission officer in such proceedings; and
any sum required in connection with the settlement of a claim that
has or might have given rise to such proceedings.
The Legacy Commission may make arrangements for the legal
representation of any Legacy Commission officer in any proceedings
mentioned in
sub-paragraph (1)
.
The
Employer’s Liability (Defective Equipment and Compulsory Insurance)
(Northern Ireland) Order 1972
(S.I. 1972/963 (N.I. 6)), and any provision
under the law of England and Wales or Scotland that has a corresponding
effect, does not require insurance to be effected by the Legacy Commission.
The Legacy Commission is liable for the unlawful conduct of a person
which occurs when the person is acting, or purporting to act, as a seconded
Legacy Commission officer in the same manner as an employer is liable in
respect of unlawful conduct of employees in the course of their employment.
If the unlawful conduct is a tort, the Legacy Commission is accordingly to
be treated as a joint tortfeasor.
A Legacy Commission officer is not to be regarded as in police service for
the purposes of—
section 200 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 .
This paragraph
does not apply to a Director of Investigations (but see
Part
3
of this Schedule).
In this Part of this Schedule—
In this Schedule —
“designated” means designated under section 15 (and “designation” is to be read accordingly);
“designated Legacy Commission officer” means a Legacy Commission officer who is designated;
“operational powers” means the powers and privileges which a designated Legacy Commission officer has by virtue of a designation;
“powers and privileges of a Northern Ireland constable” means the powers and privileges of a constable if, and to the extent that, they are exercisable in Northern Ireland or the adjacent United Kingdom waters;
“powers and privileges of an English and Welsh constable” means the powers and privileges of a constable if, and to the extent that, they are exercisable in England and Wales or the adjacent United Kingdom waters;
“powers and privileges of a Scottish constable” means the powers and privileges of a constable if, and to the extent that, they are exercisable in Scotland or the adjacent United Kingdom waters;
“United Kingdom waters” means the sea and other waters within the seaward limits of the territorial sea.
A designated Legacy Commission officer has—
in Northern Ireland and the adjacent United Kingdom waters, all
the powers and privileges of a Northern Ireland constable;
in England and Wales and the adjacent United Kingdom waters,
all the powers and privileges of an English and Welsh constable;
in Scotland and the adjacent United Kingdom waters, all the powers
and privileges of a Scottish constable.
But that is subject to—
section 15 (3) , and
paragraphs 3 and 4 .
A designated Legacy Commission officer may exercise the powers and
privileges of a Scottish constable only if—
a Scottish general authorisation is in force, and the powers and
privileges are exercised in accordance with that authorisation, or
a Scottish operational authorisation is in force in relation to a
particular operation, and the powers and privileges are exercised—
in connection with that operation, and
in accordance with that authorisation.
In this paragraph —
“Scottish general authorisation” means an agreement between—
the Directors of Investigations acting jointly, and
the Scottish Ministers,
about the exercise of the powers and privileges of a Scottish constable by designated Legacy Commission officers;
“Scottish operational authorisation” means an agreement between—
the Directors of Investigations acting jointly, and
an officer in the Police Service of Scotland who is at or above
the rank of Assistant Chief Constable,
about the exercise of the powers and privileges of a Scottish constable by designated Legacy Commission officers in connection with a particular operation.
A designation may be made subject to any limitations specified in the
designation.
In particular, a designation may include—
limitations on which operational powers the designated Legacy
Commission officer has;
limitations on the purposes for which the designated Legacy
Commission officer may exercise operational powers which that
person has.
This paragraph
does not apply to the designation of a Director of
Investigations under
section 15
(1)
.
A designation has effect without limitation of time, unless the designation
specifies a period for which it is to have effect.
But that is subject to any modification or withdrawal of the designation.
This paragraph
does not apply to the designation of a Director of
Investigations under
section 15
(1)
(which has effect without limitation of
time).
A designated Legacy Commission officer must produce evidence of the
designation if—
that Legacy Commission officer exercises, or purports to exercise,
any operational power in relation to another person in reliance on
the designation, and
the other person requests that Legacy Commission officer to produce
such evidence.
If the designated Legacy Commission officer fails to produce such evidence,
that failure does not make the exercise of the operational power invalid.
Any power or privilege of a constable is, when exercisable by a designated
Legacy Commission officer, subject to any territorial restrictions on its
exercise to which it is subject when exercisable by a constable.
This paragraph
applies to legislation if it provides for the issuing of
warrants which authorise a constable to exercise any power or privilege
of a constable.
For the purpose of enabling a designated Legacy Commission officer to
exercise that power or privilege, the legislation has effect as if the designated
Legacy Commission officer were a constable.
The Legacy Commission must ensure that any instruction given by the
Lord Advocate or procurator fiscal in relation to the investigation of offences
is complied with when designated Legacy Commission officers are
exercising the powers and privileges of Scottish constables.
If a power or privilege of a constable is exercisable by any Legacy
Commission officer, a reference to a constable in any legislation which
relates to that power or privilege is to be taken to be, or to include, a
reference to any Legacy Commission officer by whom that power or
privilege is exercisable.
It is an offence for a person to assault—
a designated Legacy Commission officer in the execution of that
Legacy Commission officer’s duty, or
a person assisting a designated Legacy Commission officer in the
execution of that Legacy Commission officer’s duty.
Sub-paragraph (1)
(a)
does not apply to an assault on a designated Legacy
Commission officer under the law of England and Wales (instead see section
1 of the Assaults on Emergency Workers (Offences) Act 2018).
A person who commits an offence under this paragraph is liable—
on conviction on indictment in Northern Ireland, to imprisonment
for a term not exceeding 2 years or a fine (or both);
on summary conviction in Northern Ireland, to imprisonment for
a term not exceeding 6 months or a fine not exceeding the statutory
maximum (or both);
on summary conviction in England and Wales, to imprisonment for
a term not exceeding 6 months or a fine (or both);
on summary conviction in Scotland, to imprisonment for a term not
exceeding 12 months or a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum
(or both).
In
this paragraph
, references to the execution of the duty of a designated
Legacy Commission officer are to—
the exercise of a power or privilege conferred by virtue of the
designation of the Legacy Commission officer;
the performance of a duty imposed by virtue of the designation of
the Legacy Commission officer.
It is an offence for a person to resist, obstruct or impede—
a designated Legacy Commission officer in the execution of that
Legacy Commission officer’s duty, or
a person assisting a designated Legacy Commission officer in the
execution of that Legacy Commission officer’s duty.
A person who commits an offence under this paragraph is liable—
on conviction on indictment in Northern Ireland, to imprisonment
for a term not exceeding 2 years or a fine (or both);
on summary conviction in Northern Ireland, to imprisonment for
a term not exceeding 6 months or a fine not exceeding the statutory
maximum (or both);
on summary conviction in England and Wales, to imprisonment for
a term not exceeding 51 weeks or a fine not exceeding level 3 on
the standard scale (or both);
on summary conviction in Scotland, to imprisonment for a term not
exceeding 12 months or a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum
(or both).
In
this paragraph
, references to the execution of the duty of a designated
Legacy Commission officer are to—
the exercise of a power or privilege conferred by virtue of the
designation of the Legacy Commission officer;
the performance of a duty imposed by virtue of the designation of
the Legacy Commission officer.
In relation to an offence committed before the commencement of
section
280
(2)
of the
Criminal Justice Act 2003
(alteration of penalties for summary
offences), the reference in
sub-paragraph (2)
(c)
to 51 weeks is to be read
as a reference to one month.
It is an offence for a person (P), with intent to deceive, to—
impersonate a designated Legacy Commission officer,
make any statement or do any act calculated falsely to suggest that
P is a designated Legacy Commission officer, or
make any statement or do any act calculated falsely to suggest that
P has powers as a designated Legacy Commission officer that exceed
the powers that P actually has.
A person who commits an offence under this paragraph is liable—
on conviction on indictment in Northern Ireland, to imprisonment
for a term not exceeding 12 months or a fine (or both);
on summary conviction in Northern Ireland, to imprisonment for
a term not exceeding 3 months or a fine not exceeding the statutory
maximum (or both);
on summary conviction in England and Wales, to imprisonment for
a term not exceeding 6 months or a fine (or both);
on summary conviction in Scotland, to imprisonment for a term not
exceeding 3 months or a fine not exceeding level 4 on the standard
scale (or both).
The power of a person under
section 111
(2)
to make consequential provision
includes power to make such provision as the person considers appropriate
in consequence of—
designated Legacy Commission officers, or
a description of designated Legacy Commission officers,
having the powers and privileges of a constable in accordance with
this
Schedule
.
That provision may (in particular)—
provide for designated Legacy Commission officers to benefit from
exemptions or other protection in respect of the exercise of
operational powers;
provide for the disclosure of information to, or the doing of other
things in relation to, designated Legacy Commission officers;
confer functions on Legacy Commission officers or any other person;
provide for a description of Legacy Commission officers (whether
identified by reference to a grade or pay scale or otherwise) to be
treated as the equivalent of one or more ranks of the PSNI;
apply any legislation (including a description of legislation), with
or without modifications.
The Legacy Commission may require a person to pay a penalty if the
Legacy Commission is satisfied, on a balance of probabilities, that the
person—
has failed to do anything that the person is required to do by a
notice under
section 17
, and
does not have a reasonable excuse for the failure.
A penalty—
may not exceed £5,000;
is payable to the Legacy Commission on demand.
If the Legacy Commission decides to require a person to pay a penalty
under
this Part
of
this Schedule
, the Legacy Commission must give the
person a penalty notice.
A penalty notice must—
be in writing,
state the Legacy Commission’s reasons for deciding to require the
person to pay a penalty,
state the amount of the penalty,
specify the date on which it is given,
specify the date before which the penalty must be paid (which must
be at least 28 days after the date specified in the notice as the date
on which it is given),
specify how a penalty must be paid,
include an explanation of the steps that the person may take if the
person objects to the penalty (including specifying the manner and
form in which any notice of objection must be given to the Legacy
Commission), and
include an explanation of the steps the Legacy Commission may
take to recover any unpaid penalty.
The recipient of a penalty notice (the “recipient”) may object to the penalty
notice by giving a notice of objection to the Legacy Commission.
A notice of objection must—
be in writing,
give the reasons for the objection,
be given to the Legacy Commission in the manner and form
specified in the penalty notice, and
be given before the end of the period of 28 days beginning with
the date specified in the penalty notice as the date on which it is
given.
Where a notice of objection is given in accordance with sub-paragraph (2) , the Legacy Commission must consider it and do one of the following—
cancel the penalty;
reduce the penalty;
increase the penalty;
determine not to alter the penalty.
After deciding how to proceed under
sub-paragraph (3)
, the Legacy
Commission must notify the recipient of the decision in writing.
A notification under
sub-paragraph (4)
must be given before the end of
the period of 70 days beginning with the date specified in the penalty
notice as the day on which it is given, or such longer period as the Legacy
Commission may agree with the recipient.
A notification under
sub-paragraph (4)
, other than one notifying the
recipient that the Legacy Commission has decided to cancel the penalty,
must—
state the amount of the penalty following the Legacy Commission’s
consideration of the notice of objection,
state the Legacy Commission’s reasons for the decision under sub-paragraph (3) ,
specify the date before which the penalty must be paid (which must
be at least 28 days after the day on which the notification is given),
specify how the penalty must be paid,
include an explanation of the recipient’s rights of appeal, and
include an explanation of the steps the Legacy Commission may
take to recover any unpaid penalty.
A person (the “appellant”) may appeal to the court against a decision to
require the person to pay a penalty under
this Part
of
this Schedule
.
An appeal may be brought only if the appellant has given a notice of
objection and the Legacy Commission has reduced, increased, or determined
not to alter the penalty under
paragraph 3
(3)
.
An appeal must be brought within the period of 28 days beginning with
the day on which the person is notified of the Legacy Commission’s decision
on the notice of objection under
paragraph 3
(4)
.
On appeal, the court may—
allow the appeal and cancel the penalty,
allow the appeal and reduce the penalty, or
dismiss the appeal.
An appeal—
is to be a re-hearing of the Legacy Commission’s decision to impose
a penalty, and
may be determined having regard to matters of which the Legacy
Commission was unaware.
Sub-paragraph (5) (a) has effect despite any provision of rules of court.
Where an appeal is made under this paragraph, the penalty is not payable
until the appeal is determined or withdrawn unless the court orders
otherwise.
In this paragraph “the court” means—
in Northern Ireland, a county court;
in England and Wales, the county court;
in Scotland, a sheriff.
This paragraph
applies where a sum is payable to the Legacy Commission
as a penalty under
this Part
of
this Schedule
.
In England and Wales, the penalty is recoverable as if it were payable
under an order of the county court in England and Wales.
In Scotland, the penalty may be enforced in the same manner as an extract
registered decree arbitral bearing a warrant for execution issued by the
sheriff court of any sheriffdom in Scotland.
In Northern Ireland, the penalty is recoverable as if it were payable under
an order of a county court in Northern Ireland.
Where action is taken under
this paragraph
for the recovery of a sum
payable as a penalty under
this Part
of
this Schedule
, the penalty is—
in relation to England and Wales, to be treated for the purposes of
section 98
of the
Courts Act 2003
(register of judgments and orders
etc) as if it were a judgment entered in the county court;
in relation to Northern Ireland, to be treated for the purposes of
Article 116
of the
Judgments Enforcement (Northern Ireland) Order
1981
(S.I. 1981/226 (N.I. 6)) (register of judgments) as if it were a
judgment in respect of which an application has been accepted
under
Article 22
or
23
(1)
of
that Order
.
The Legacy Commission must pay into the Consolidated Fund any penalty
paid or recovered under
this Part
of
this Schedule
.
The Legacy Commission may give a notice to any person by—
handing it to them,
leaving it at their proper address,
sending it by post to that address, or
sending it by email to the person’s email address.
A person’s proper address for the purposes of sub-paragraph (1) is—
where that person is a body corporate, the address of its registered
office or principal office;
where that person is a partnership or an unincorporated association
or body, the address of its principal office;
in any other case, that person’s last known address.
A person’s email address for the purposes of sub-paragraph (1) is—
an email address identified for the time being by that person as an
address for contacting that person, or
if an email address is not so identified, an email address which the
Legacy Commission believes is used by that person.
For the purposes of this sub-paragraph, a person “identifies” an email address by providing it to the Legacy Commission or publishing it.
A notice sent to a person by email is, unless the contrary is proved, to be
treated as having been given on the working day immediately following
the day on which it was sent.
In
sub-paragraph (4)
“working day” means a day other than a Saturday,
a Sunday, Christmas Day, Good Friday or a bank holiday under the Banking
and Financial Dealings Act 1971 in any part of the United Kingdom.
In this Part of this Schedule —
“notice of objection” means a notice given under paragraph 3 (1) ;
“penalty notice” means a notice given under paragraph 2 (1) .
A person commits an offence if they do anything that is intended to have
the effect of—
distorting or otherwise altering any evidence, document or other
thing that is produced or provided pursuant to a notice under
section 17
, or
preventing any evidence, document or other thing from being
produced or provided pursuant to such a notice.
A person commits an offence if they do anything that the person knows
or believes is likely to have the effect described in
sub-paragraph (1)
(a)
or
(b)
.
A person commits an offence if the person—
intentionally suppresses or conceals, or
intentionally alters or destroys,
a document that is, and that the person knows or believes to be, a relevant document.
For that purpose a document is a “relevant document” if it is likely that a
Director of Investigations or a judicial panel member would (if aware of
its existence) wish to be provided with it in connection with an investigation
under
Part 3
or (as the case may be) inquisitorial proceedings allocated to
them.
Proceedings for an offence under paragraph 8 or 9 may be instituted—
in England and Wales, only by or with the consent of the Director
of Public Prosecutions;
in Northern Ireland, only by or with the consent of the Director of
Public Prosecutions for Northern Ireland.
A person who commits an offence under paragraph 8 or 9 is liable on
summary conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding the relevant
maximum or a fine not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale (or both).
“The relevant maximum” means—
in Northern Ireland, 6 months;
in England and Wales, 51 weeks;
in Scotland, 12 months.
In relation to an offence committed before the commencement of
section
281
(5)
of the
Criminal Justice Act 2003
(alteration of penalties for summary
offences), the reference in
sub-paragraph (2)
(b)
to 51 weeks is to be read
as a reference to 6 months.
The Legacy Commission must, from time to time, identify any information
held by it in connection with an investigation under
Part 3
, or inquisitorial
proceedings, which is (in its opinion)—
sensitive information, or
prejudicial information.
The duty under sub-paragraph
(1)
does not require the Legacy Commission
to identify information as sensitive information, or as prejudicial
information, if a relevant authority has notified it (in accordance with
paragraph 2
or
3
) that the relevant authority has identified the information
as that kind of information.
This paragraph
applies if a relevant authority is proposing to make any
information available to the Legacy Commission (whether in accordance
with
section 16
or otherwise).
The relevant authority must identify any of the information which is (in
its opinion)—
sensitive information, or
prejudicial information.
When making the information available to the Legacy Commission, the
relevant authority must notify the Legacy Commission of any of the
information which it has identified in accordance with this paragraph.
This paragraph applies if a person other than a relevant authority—
is proposing to make any information available to the Legacy
Commission, or
has made any information available to the Legacy Commission.
A relevant authority may identify any of the information which is (in its
opinion)—
sensitive information, or
prejudicial information.
The relevant authority must notify the Legacy Commission of any of the
information which it has identified in accordance with this paragraph.
A notification of information under
paragraph 2
or
3
must include a
statement of whether, in the relevant authority’s opinion, the information
would, if disclosed generally, be—
sensitive information,
prejudicial information, or
information of both of those kinds.
The Secretary of State may notify the Legacy Commission of—
any information held by the Legacy Commission, or
any information which any person is proposing to make available
to the Legacy Commission,
which is, in the Secretary of State’s opinion, protected international information.
Paragraphs 2
to
6
set out which disclosures of information are “permitted”
for the purposes of
section 20
(3)
.
A disclosure of any information by the Legacy Commission to the Secretary
of State is permitted.
A disclosure of any information by the Legacy Commission is permitted
if the disclosure—
is made in the course of inquisitorial proceedings or is contained
in a report published under
section 74
on the findings of such
proceedings, and
does not contravene a restriction notice or restriction order (within
the meaning given by
section 64
(2)
).
A disclosure of sensitive information by the Legacy Commission to a person
listed in
sub-paragraph (2)
is permitted if—
the Legacy Commission notifies the Secretary of State of the
proposed disclosure, and
the disclosure is made after the end of the period of 10 working
days beginning with the day on which the notification is given.
The persons to whom a disclosure is permitted under this paragraph are—
the Director of Public Prosecutions for Northern Ireland;
the Director of Public Prosecutions;
the Lord Advocate;
a member of a police force;
a National Crime Agency officer;
the inspectorate, for the purposes of, or in connection with, an
inspection under
section 27
;
a coroner in Northern Ireland or England and Wales who is—
a judge of the High Court in Northern Ireland,
a judge of the High Court in England and Wales,
a county court judge in Northern Ireland, or
a Circuit judge in England and Wales;
a sheriff in Scotland, if the disclosure is made in respect of an
inquiry into a death being, or to be, held under the
Inquiries into
Fatal Accidents and Sudden Deaths etc. (Scotland) Act 2016
(asp 2);
the Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland or an officer of the
Ombudsman (within the meaning given by
section 50
of the
Police
(Northern Ireland) Act 1998
), if the disclosure is made in respect
of—
a referral under section 85 , or
an investigation carried out under section 56 of the
Police
(Northern Ireland) Act 1998
following such a referral.
In this paragraph “working day” means any day other than—
a Saturday or a Sunday,
Christmas Day or Good Friday, or
a day which is a bank holiday under the
Banking and Financial
Dealings Act 1971
in any part of the United Kingdom.
A disclosure of sensitive information by the Legacy Commission is permitted
if—
the Legacy Commission notifies the Secretary of State of the
proposed disclosure, and
the Secretary of State’s notification under
sub-paragraph (2)
states
that the proposed disclosure is permitted.
The Secretary of State must respond to a notification under
sub-paragraph
(1)
(a)
within the relevant decision period (see
paragraph 7
), by notifying
the Legacy Commission either—
that the proposed disclosure is permitted, or
that the proposed disclosure is prohibited.
The Secretary of State may give a notification that the proposed disclosure
is prohibited only if, in the Secretary of State’s view, the disclosure of the
sensitive information would not be in the public interest.
When determining whether a disclosure of sensitive information would
not be in the public interest, the Secretary of State must (in particular) have
regard to—
whether the proposed disclosure would risk damaging, or would
damage, the national security interests of the United Kingdom,
the potential seriousness and extent of any such risk or damage,
and
the significance of the information to be disclosed to matters of
public concern.
If the Secretary of State’s notification under
sub-paragraph (2)
states that
the proposed disclosure is prohibited, the notification must contain the
Secretary of State’s reasons for the prohibition.
Sub-paragraph (5)
applies so far as the Secretary of State considers that
reasons can be given without risking damage to, or damaging, the national
security interests of the United Kingdom.
A disclosure of protected international information by the Legacy
Commission is permitted if—
the Legacy Commission notifies the Secretary of State of the
proposed disclosure, and
the Secretary of State’s notification under
sub-paragraph (2)
states
that the proposed disclosure is permitted.
The Secretary of State must respond to a notification under
sub-paragraph
(1)
(a)
within the relevant decision period, by notifying the Legacy
Commission either—
that the proposed disclosure is permitted, or
that the proposed disclosure is prohibited.
The Secretary of State may give a notification that the proposed disclosure
is prohibited only if, in the Secretary of State’s view, the disclosure of the
protected international information would, or would be likely to, damage
international relations.
In
paragraph 5
or
6
“relevant decision period”, in relation to a proposed
disclosure notified to the Secretary of State, means—
the period of 60 days beginning with the day on which the Secretary
of State’s notification is given, or
any reasonable longer period which the Secretary of State specifies,
in notice given to the Legacy Commission before the end of the
period of 60 days, as the period which the Secretary of State wishes
to take in order to make a decision whether to permit or prohibit
the proposed disclosure.
But if the court directs the Secretary of State to remake a decision—
on an appeal under paragraph 10 , or
on any further appeal under paragraph 11 ,
“relevant decision period” means the period for remaking that decision in compliance with that direction.
This paragraph applies if—
it is proposed to disclose sensitive information in a report under section 46 (final report on findings of investigation),
the Secretary of State is notified of the proposed disclosure in
accordance with
paragraph 5
(1)
(a)
, and
the Secretary of State decides to prohibit the proposed disclosure
in the report (the “affected report”).
The affected report must include a statement that the Secretary of State has
decided to prohibit the proposed disclosure.
The statement must also set out any reasons for prohibiting the disclosure
which the Secretary of State gives in accordance with
paragraph 5
(5)
.
An initial appeal may be brought by the following—
in any case—
the Legacy Commission;
any relevant family member of any person whose death was
caused by the conduct to which the investigation relates;
any person caused to suffer serious physical or mental harm
by that conduct or, where such a person has subsequently
died, any relevant family member of the person;
where the investigation is carried out pursuant to a request under section 35 , the person who requested the investigation;
where the investigation is initiated under
section 39
, any person
who could request under
section 35
an investigation of the conduct
to which the investigation relates.
For the purposes of this paragraph, a person (F) is a “relevant family
member” of a person (D) who has died if—
F is a close family member of D (see section 113 ), or
F is another member of the family of D and—
the investigation is being carried out pursuant to a request
by F under
section 34
(1)
(b)
, or
the relevant court (as defined by
paragraph 10
) considers it
appropriate for F to bring the appeal.
An initial appeal must be brought within the period of 28 days beginning
with the day on which the affected report is published under
section 49
.
Where—
the affected report includes a statement relating to the proposed
disclosure in accordance with
this paragraph
,
an initial appeal is brought against the Secretary of State’s decision
not to permit the proposed disclosure, and
the Secretary of State remakes the decision in accordance with a
direction given by the court,
a new final report (on the findings of the investigation to which the affected report relates) must be produced in accordance with section 46 .
This paragraph applies if—
the Legacy Commission proposes to disclose sensitive information
otherwise than in a final report,
it notifies the Secretary of State of the proposed disclosure in
accordance with
paragraph 5
(1)
(a)
, and
the Secretary of State decides to prohibit the proposed disclosure.
An initial appeal may be brought by the Legacy Commission.
An initial appeal must be brought within the period of 28 days beginning
with the day on which the Secretary of State’s notification under
paragraph
5
(2)
is given.
In
this Part
of
this Schedule
“initial appeal” means an appeal to the relevant
court against the Secretary of State’s decision not to permit the proposed
disclosure.
The function of the relevant court on an initial appeal is to review the
Secretary of State’s decision not to permit the proposed disclosure.
In determining an initial appeal, the relevant court must apply the principles
applicable on an application for judicial review or, in Scotland, an
application to the supervisory jurisdiction of the Court of Session.
On an initial appeal—
the court has the power to quash the Secretary of State’s decision;
if the court quashes the decision, it must direct the Secretary of
State to remake the decision within—
the period of 60 days beginning with the day on which the
court gives the direction, or
any reasonable longer period which the court specifies (after
considering any representations made by a party to the
proceedings).
If the court does not exercise that power to quash the decision, it must
dismiss the appeal.
In this paragraph “the relevant court” means—
the High Court in Northern Ireland,
the High Court in England and Wales, or
the Outer House of the Court of Session.
This paragraph applies if the relevant court has determined an initial appeal.
The person who brought the initial appeal may bring an appeal in the
appeal court against the determination of the initial appeal (a “further
appeal”).
But that person may bring the further appeal only with the permission
of—
the relevant court which determined the initial appeal, or
the appeal court.
The court may give such permission only if it satisfied that—
the further appeal would raise some important point of principle
or practice, or
there is some other compelling reason for the further appeal to be
heard.
In this paragraph “the appeal court” means—
the Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland,
the Court of Appeal in England and Wales, or
the Inner House of the Court of Session.
Any proceedings on an initial appeal or a further appeal (including any
proceedings before the Supreme Court) are to be treated as section 6
proceedings, within the meaning of the
Justice and Security Act 2013
, for
the purposes of
sections 8
to
14
of
that Act
.
Sections 8
to
14
of
that Act
apply in relation to proceedings treated as
section 6 proceedings by
sub-paragraph (1)
as if—
the Secretary of State were the relevant person, and
the references to the interests of national security in
sections 8
,
11
and
13
of
that Act
were references to the interests of national security
or the interests of the international relations of the United Kingdom.
But
sections 8
to
14
of
that Act
, and rules of court relating to section 6
proceedings, do not prevent an appeal under
this paragraph
from being
considered in the presence of—
the Legacy Commission,
a Legacy Commission officer nominated by it, or
a legal representative of the Legacy Commission.
In this Part of this Schedule —
“affected report” has the meaning given in paragraph 8 (1) (c) ;
“further appeal” has the meaning given in paragraph 11 ;
“initial appeal” has the meaning given in paragraph 10 ;
The
Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023
is
amended as follows.
In
section 1
, omit
subsection (4)
(definition of “other harmful conduct
forming part of the Troubles”).
In section 38 (no criminal investigations except through Legacy Subsection (1) does not prevent a relevant person (as defined by
section 44
of the Northern Ireland Troubles Act 2026) from doing
Commission), after subsection (1) insert—
“(1A)
anything for the purposes of an assistance agreement (within the
meaning of that section).”
Omit section 39 (grant of immunity: prohibition of criminal enforcement
action).
In section 40 (criminal enforcement action)—
in the heading, for “No grant of immunity:” substitute “Serious or
connected Troubles-related offences:”;
in subsection (1) omit the words from “unless” to the end;
“(1A)
Criminal enforcement action may not be taken against P in
respect of the offence by P except in accordance with—(a)
subsection (2) (following a referral of P’s conduct to
a prosecutor), or(b)
subsections (3) or (4) (but only before such a referral
- see subsections (5) and (6)).”;
in
subsection (2)
(b)
, for “section 25” substitute “section
51
or
70
of
that Act”;
in subsections (3) and (4) —
for “An ICRIR officer” substitute “A Legacy Commission
officer”;
for “the ICRIR’s functions” substitute “a relevant function”;
“(4A)
In subsections (3) and (4) “relevant function” means a
function under the Northern Ireland Troubles Act 2026 of—(a)
(b)
a Director of Investigations;
(c)
a judicial panel member.”
In section 42 (general provision and saving for ongoing pre-commencement
action)—
in subsection (1) for “any of sections 38 to 41” substitute “section
38 or 40”;
in subsection (2) for “sections 39 to 41” substitute “section 40”;
in subsection (4) omit “or 41”;
in subsection (5) for “, 40 or 41” substitute “or 40”.
In section 52 (academic research)—
in
subsection (1)
(e)
, for “the seventh year of the period of operation
of the ICRIR” substitute “the period of seven years beginning with
the day on which
section 4
of the Northern Ireland Troubles Act
2026 (the Legacy Commission) comes into force for all purposes”;
in
subsections (5)
,
(7)
and
(8)
, for “ICRIR reports” substitute “Legacy
Commission reports”;
in subsection (9) —
““
historical record” means the historical record produced
by the Legacy Commission under section 101 of the Northern Ireland Troubles Act 2026;
omit the definition of “ICRIR reports”.
“Chief Commissioner”;
“chief officer”;
“Commissioner for Investigations”;
“Commissioners”;
“final report”;
“financial year”;
“GCHQ”;
“His Majesty’s forces”;
“historical record”;
“the ICRIR”;
“ICRIR contractor”;
“ICRIR officers”;
“immunity function”;
“immunity requests panel”;
“inspector of constabulary for Northern Ireland”;
“other harmful conduct forming part of the Troubles”;
“period of operation of the ICRIR”;
“police force in Great Britain”;
“prejudicial information”;
“protected international information”;
“PSNI”;
“relevant authority”;
“request for a review”;
“review function”;
“sensitive information”.
In Schedule 12 (prisoner release) omit—
paragraph 2(2);
paragraph 3(2).
In Schedule 13 (amendments) omit paragraph 11.
In the Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973 omit section 23C (actions relating to the Northern Ireland Troubles).
In the
Limitation Act 1980
omit
section 27D
(actions relating to the Northern
Ireland Troubles).
In the
Foreign Limitation Periods Act 1984
omit
section 4A
(actions relating
to the Northern Ireland Troubles).
In the
Merchant Shipping Act 1995
, in
section 190
(time limit for proceedings
against ship owner or ships) omit subsection (7).
The Northern Ireland (Sentences) Act 1998 is amended as follows.
In section 3 (applications for declaration of eligibility for release)—
“(6A)
An offence is a qualifying offence if subsection (7) or (7A)
applies to the offence.”;
omit subsection (6B) .
In
Schedule 3
(sentences passed outside Northern Ireland), in
paragraph
2
—
“(A1)
An offence is equivalent to a qualifying offence if
sub-paragraph (1) or (1A) applies to the offence.”;
omit sub-paragraph (A2) .
In
section 379
of the
Sentencing Act 2020
(behaviour orders), in the table
in subsection (1), omit the entry for
section 26
of the
Northern Ireland
Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023
and the heading preceding
it.
In the
Foreign Limitation Periods (Northern Ireland) Order 1985
omit
Article
5A
(actions relating to the Northern Ireland Troubles).
In the
Limitation (Northern Ireland) Order 1989
omit
Article 73A
(actions
relating to the Northern Ireland Troubles).
A
bill
to
make new provision to address the legacy of the Northern Ireland Troubles.
Brought from the Commons on
Ordered to be Printed, .
© Parliamentary copyright House of Commons and House of Lords 2026
This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament Licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright
Published by the authority of the House of Lords