This HTML version does not include page and line references. Please use the pdf version for page and line references.
Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation (Freedom of Expression) Bill [HL]
[As Introduced]
CONTENTS
[As Introduced]

A

bill

to

Make provision about individual expression on matters of public interest; for participation in debates on matters of public interest; and for discouraging the use of litigation as a means of limiting expression on matters of public interest.

B e it enacted by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:—

1 Dismissal of proceedings that limit debate

(1)

On a motion by a defendant to a proceeding brought in the High Court or
the County Court a judge must, subject to section 2 , dismiss the proceeding
against the defendant if the defendant satisfies the judge on a balance of
probabilities that the proceeding arises from an expression made by the
defendant that relates to a matter of public interest.

(2)

A judge may of his or her own motion dismiss the proceeding at any stage
if the judge concludes that the proceeding is abusive and brought with a view
unduly to limit an expression on matters of public interest.

2 No dismissal


A judge must not dismiss a proceeding under section 1 if the claimant satisfies
the judge that—

(a)

there are grounds to believe that the proceeding has substantial merit,
and

(b)

the harm suffered or likely to be suffered by the claimant as a result
of the defendant’s expression is sufficiently serious that the public
interest in permitting the proceeding to continue outweighs the public
interest in protecting that expression.

3 The public interest


In weighing the public interest the judge must take into account factors
including but not limited to—

(a)

the right of an individual or organisation to vindicate their reputation
through litigation;

(b)

the right and value of freedom of expression;

(c)

the right and value of public participation in democratic discourse;

(d)

the actual or potential chilling effect of the proceeding on future
expression generally on matters of public interest;

(e)

the history of litigation between the parties, including the choice of
jurisdiction, any refusal by the claimant to engage in good faith in
negotiations for settlement, or the use of dilatory strategies or
intimidatory conduct;

(f)

any disproportion between the resources deployed by the claimant or
financed by third parties, and the harm caused or the amount of
damages likely to be awarded for that harm, if proved;

(g)

the possibility that the expression might provoke hostility against an
identifiably vulnerable group.

4 Definition of “expression”


In this Act, “expression” means any communication, regardless of whether it
is made verbally or non-verbally, whether it is made publicly or privately,
and whether or not it is directed at a person or entity.

5 Stay of proceeding


Upon the filing of a motion, no further step may be taken in the proceeding
by any party until the motion, including any appeal against the motion, has
been finally disposed of.

6 No amendment to pleadings


Unless a judge orders otherwise, the claimant is not permitted to amend his
or her pleadings in the proceeding—

(a)

in order to prevent or avoid an order under this Act dismissing the
proceeding; or

(b)

if the proceeding is dismissed under the Act, in order to continue the
proceeding.

7 Costs on dismissal


If a judge dismisses a proceeding under this Act, the defendant is entitled to
costs on the motion and in the proceeding on a full indemnity basis, unless
the judge determines that such an award is not appropriate in the
circumstances.

8 Costs if motion to dismiss denied


If the judge does not dismiss a proceeding under this Act, the claimant is not
entitled to costs on the motion, unless the judge determines that such an
award is appropriate in the circumstances.

9 Damages


If, in dismissing a proceeding under this Act, the judge finds that the claimant
brought the proceeding in bad faith or for an improper purpose, the judge
may award the defendant such damages as the judge considers appropriate.

10 Legal aid

(1)

Schedule 1 to the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act
2012 is amended as follows.

(2)

After Paragraph 20 insert—


“Applications to dismiss gagging proceedings


20A

Civil legal services provided in relation to an application to dismiss
proceedings, including mediation, advocacy and appeal, under the
Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation (Freedom of
Expression) Act 2022.


Exclusions


20B

Sub-paragraph (1) is subject to the exclusions in Parts 2 and 3 of
this Schedule.”

11 Rules


Rules may be made by the Civil Procedure Rules Committee under the Civil
Procedure Act 1997 for the purposes of this Act.

12 Commencement, extent and short title

(1)

This Act comes into force on the day on which it is passed.

(2)

This Act extends to England and Wales.

(3)

This Act may be cited as the Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation
(Freedom of Expression) Act 2022.

Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation (Freedom of Expression) Bill [HL]
[As Introduced]

A

bill

to

Make provision about individual expression on matters of public interest; for participation in debates on matters of public interest; and for discouraging the use of litigation as a means of limiting expression on matters of public interest.

Lord Thomas of Gresford

Ordered to be Printed, .

© Parliamentary copyright House of Lords 2022

This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament Licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright

Published by the authority of the House of Lords